[CentOS] Still Confused about Firewalling
ML
mailinglists at MailNewsRSS.comMon Oct 19 18:25:40 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] apache env vars - best practices
- Next message: [CentOS] Still Confused about Firewalling
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi All, Sorry, I am still confused about implementing a firewall without having my ISP static route all of my traffic to my public IP's to a single public IP. So before when I have done this for work all traffic has been statically routed. Now I have a comcast modem and it is 'pass through' so traffic for all my 13 IP's is allowed and I have to decide what to do. So I am looking at Vyatta or UnTangle. I have a machine with 3 NIC'e in it. I think one would be In, DMZ and last private. What happens? I have one cable from my comcast gateway to my firewalls NIC, but how does it answer for all IP's that I have so i can evaluate the request incoming to a rule set and decide if allowed or denied? I am missing something fundamental! Can anyone help this click in my head? Without statically routing my traffic I dont get it. Say a request comes to my webserver 172.13.167.xxx on port 80, but my firewall's IP for the card is 172.13.167.zzz how does it answer for 172.13.167.xxx? -Jason
- Previous message: [CentOS] apache env vars - best practices
- Next message: [CentOS] Still Confused about Firewalling
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list