[CentOS] CentOS vs Fedora?

James Matthews nytrokiss at gmail.com
Thu Sep 10 04:59:08 UTC 2009


I wouldn't use Fedora for my servers. It's a great distro for desktop use
but I didn't like it's server usage.

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:35 PM, David Suhendrik <david at pnyet.web.id> wrote:

>  Ron Blizzard wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 6:31 PM, David Suhendrik<david at pnyet.web.id> <david at pnyet.web.id> wrote:
>
>
>  Dear All,
> I'm newbie and i want to know Your opinion about CentOS vs Fedora, hopefully
> this isn't make a flame, and just to curious..
> Actucally now I'm using CentOS as some servers. ^_^'
>
>
>  For me CentOS is just a better choice. I prefer stability to "cutting
> edge" -- even for my desktop computers (I don't have any servers).
> I've tried several versions of Fedora -- liked the earlier versions,
> thought versions 7 through 9 were a bit too "cutting edge," but am
> impressed with 10 and 11. Still, due to the nature of Fedora, you've
> got a *lot* of upgrades and I think that would beat me down after a
> while. If CentOS (or Scientific Linux) didn't exist, I would probably
> use Fedora.
>
>
>
>  I'm using CentOS with reason same as You, I'm isn't beta tester and won't
> using tester on productive servers. But sometimes i'm using Fedora repos for
> upgrade some packages.
>
> Cheers...
> --
> Regards,
> David
>  ------------------------------
> ./nobody
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>


-- 
http://www.jewelerslounge.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090910/7ef77aac/attachment.html>


More information about the CentOS mailing list