[CentOS] Backup solution to backup /var/spool/imap above 150GB data
agnello.dsouza at gmail.com
Wed Feb 24 11:24:26 UTC 2010
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Gavin Carr <gavin at openfusion.com.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:38:32AM +0100, David Hrbáč wrote:
> > Dne 24.2.2010 10:00, Agnello George napsal(a):
> > > We have an issue with one of our clients , they have a mail server
> > > the /var/spool/imap partition as 150 GB . They need to take
> > > backup on to /backup partition ( a different HDD of total 250 GB space
> ) .
> > > We have tried dar , rsync, rdiff and impasync . But its is not
> sufficing the
> > > need as to take a lot of time and consumes a lot of I/O .
> > >
> > > Is there any back up solution that you can think of , that can work in
> > > situation - open source or proprietary
> > Is seems to me, that you are using mbox format. So, differential backup
> > is hard to achieve. Migrate to maildir, every mail is a file, easy to
> > backup differentially.
> rsync and rdiff should handle mbox format okay though. Though I agree
> is generally nicer for differential backups.
> Agnello, how long is "a lot of time"? A backup is always going to have to
> the entire tree and checksum (or at least stat) every file, so there's a
> cost you're always going to have. How long does a 'find /var/spool/imap
> take, for instance?
> You might want to try brackup (http://code.google.com/p/brackup/). For
> large trees of relatively small files it seems to significantly out-perform
> rsync-based backups. I've got brackup packages in my repository (see
is it possible with " brackup " <http://code.google.com/p/brackup/> to back
it up to a different server on the same lan instead of /backup . Is there
any documentation on the same .
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CentOS