[CentOS] Weird update problem
Anne Wilson
cannewilson at googlemail.com
Tue Jan 5 12:00:51 UTC 2010
On Tuesday 05 January 2010 10:57:30 Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 01/05/2010 10:41 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > assumed that it would bring in the best-match version, and continued.
> > This morning, seeing that more updates were announced, I ran update
> > again. To my surprise, exiv2 was skipped, as before.
> >
> > I'm curious as to what could be happening here.
>
> yum clean metadata; yum repolist ; yum -d9 list exi\*
>
> might give you some clues as to whats going on.
>
That gives
Installed Packages
exiv2.i386 0.17.1-1.el5.rf installed
Available Packages
exiftags.i386 1.01-1.el5.rf rpmforge
exim.i386 4.63-3.el5 base
exim-doc.noarch 4.63-2.el5 base
exim-mon.i386 4.63-3.el5 base
exim-sa.i386 4.63-3.el5 base
exiv2.i386 0.19-1.el5.rf rpmforge
exiv2-debuginfo.i386 0.17.1-1.el5 epel-
debuginfo
exiv2-devel.i386 0.19-1.el5.rf rpmforge
rpmforge.repo is enabled, but is priority 5 - could this be a priority
problem?
Anne
--
KDE Community Working Group
New to KDE Software? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100105/8459303b/attachment.sig>
More information about the CentOS
mailing list