[CentOS] Weird update problem

Anne Wilson cannewilson at googlemail.com
Tue Jan 5 12:00:51 UTC 2010


On Tuesday 05 January 2010 10:57:30 Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 01/05/2010 10:41 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > assumed that it would bring in the best-match version, and continued. 
> > This morning, seeing that more updates were announced, I ran update
> > again.  To my surprise, exiv2 was skipped, as before.
> >
> > I'm curious as to what could be happening here.
> 
> yum clean metadata; yum repolist ; yum -d9 list exi\*
> 
> might give you some clues as to whats going on.
> 
That gives

Installed Packages
exiv2.i386                         0.17.1-1.el5.rf               installed
Available Packages
exiftags.i386                      1.01-1.el5.rf                 rpmforge
exim.i386                          4.63-3.el5                    base
exim-doc.noarch                    4.63-2.el5                    base
exim-mon.i386                      4.63-3.el5                    base
exim-sa.i386                       4.63-3.el5                    base
exiv2.i386                         0.19-1.el5.rf                 rpmforge
exiv2-debuginfo.i386               0.17.1-1.el5                  epel-
debuginfo
exiv2-devel.i386                   0.19-1.el5.rf                 rpmforge

rpmforge.repo is enabled, but is priority 5 - could this be a priority 
problem?

Anne
-- 
KDE Community Working Group
New to KDE Software? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100105/8459303b/attachment.sig>


More information about the CentOS mailing list