[CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
pasik at iki.fi
Mon Jan 11 14:26:05 UTC 2010
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 03:00:41PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 12:33:39PM +0100, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> > Karanbir Singh schrieb:
> > > On 01/08/2010 01:58 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
> > >
> > >>> the thumpers make for decent backup or vtl type roles, not so much for
> > >>> online high density storage.
> > >>>
> > >> I wonder how much that would change with a bbu NVRAM card for an
> > >> external journal for ext4 and the disks on md. Unless one cannot add a
> > >> bbu NVRAM card...
> > >>
> > >
> > > Good question, they are after all ( the Sun 45xx's ) just opteron box's
> > > with a mostly standard build. Finding a CentOS compatible ( drivers
> > > pre-included, and not crap like cciss ) would not be too hard.
> > >
> > >
> > With ZFS, the whole machine is the RAID-controller (basically).
> > NVRAM in ZFS would be used for L2ARC.
> > Of course, this ask for a sane system-desgin (which the thumpers do
> > have, as mentioned - AFAIK, there are virtually no off-the-shelf
> > motherboads that can offer the thumper's distribution of SATA-channels
> > over HT-links.
> > CentOS wouldn't run bad on such a motherboard, either (and RHEL is
> > supported).
> > ;-)
> Last time I checked only RHEL4 was support.. RHEL5 lacks (properly working)
> SATA driver for the controller used in the thumper.
> Is RHEL5 supported/working nowadays?
It seems X4500 (not available anymore) had Marvell SATA controllers, that
are not supported with RHEL5.
X4540 uses LSI SATA controllers, that are supported.
More information about the CentOS