[CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Thu Jan 28 21:26:35 UTC 2010
On 1/28/2010 3:01 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Anytime someone mentions backups, I have a knee-jerk reaction to mention
> backuppc because it is simple and will likely do anything you need.
> Docs are
> here: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ It is packaged in epel. It
> can use rsync
> (with/without ssh), smb, or tar for the backup transport.
> Generally for
> anything remote, you'll want rsync, and you'll want it badly enough
> to set it up
> even on windows targets - which is not all that difficult.
>
> --
> Les Mikesell
> lesmikesell at gmail.com <mailto:lesmikesell at gmail.com>
>
>
> Thank you Les, but I'm not looking for a new backup program. We rely on
> the platform's native backup scripts. I'm looking for recommendation for
> a fast, reliable & secure remote backup server platform
I don't understand what a 'remote backup server platform' is if it
doesn't involve backup software. If you just want to present a file or
device interface you can do that over a WAN with ordinary protocols but
you won't like it. You could split the difference with a local (to the
targets) file share where the native backups dump a copy, followed by
remote rsync'ing of that copy to a central server where a longer history
might be managed (or letting backuppc do that part for you).
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the CentOS
mailing list