[CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts

Rudi Ahlers rudiahlers at gmail.com
Thu Jan 28 22:30:02 UTC 2010


On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> This is probably getting repetitive, but backuppc provides a web
> interface where server 'owners' can browse their own backups, select
> what they want, and click a button to restore or download to their
> desktop.  It's not part of the distribution, but I think someone even
> has a fuse filesystem layer that gives normal-looking read access to the
> compressed/pooled storage.  I don't know if you can wrap samba on top of
> that, though - or what kind of performance it has.
>
> --
>    Les Mikesell
>    lesmikesell at gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
>


You're right, it is getting repetitive, but thank you for the advice, I'll
look into backuppc

ok, forget about rsync. forget about which backup script is better, and
which isn't. forget about how I get the data onto the order server. I don't
care about backups, or rsync, or backuppc or bacula or amanda, or R1soft

let's keep the question simple. WHICH filesystem would be best for this type
of operation? SMB, NFS, or iSCSI?

-- 
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100129/847c6288/attachment.html 


More information about the CentOS mailing list