[CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts

Rudi Ahlers rudiahlers at gmail.com
Fri Jan 29 10:27:49 UTC 2010


On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Geoff Galitz <geoff at galitz.org> wrote:

>  > The CIFS mounts can't be unmounted without a reboot,
>
> > so they build-up a pool of mounts to the same server which cause extra
> latency
>
>
>
> Is there an environmental restriction in your application or organization
> for this?  Normally CIFS mounts can umounted easily in runtime.
>

what do you mean by this?



>  At any rate... if I were in your shoes and really restricted to the
> options you propose, I would go with CIFS mounts through IPSEC tunnels.
>
>
>

Wouldn't IPSEC add more  overhead than an SSH tunnel?


> -geoff
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Geoff Galitz
> Blankenheim NRW, Germany
> http://www.galitz.org/
> http://german-way.com/blog/
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>


-- 
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100129/a1c7a412/attachment.html 


More information about the CentOS mailing list