[CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
Joseph L. Casale
jcasale at activenetwerx.comFri Jan 29 12:33:50 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Next message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>Actually I know nothing about iSCSI, maybe it is more robust. No. Not if, but *when* you get the first disconnection, you will likely incur corruption on the block device. That's like pulling out a disc on a running server. Doesn't make for a dependable backup solution...
- Previous message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Next message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list