[CentOS] ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so is not a symbolic link
Gordon Messmer
yinyang at eburg.comWed May 12 17:28:54 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so is not a symbolic link
- Next message: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0112 Critical CentOS 5 i386 firefox Update
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 05/11/2010 07:09 PM, a arias wrote: > > I wonder if I am the only one who is experiencing this. What could > have caused this? > Look for other files that would otherwise be the targets of a symlink: # ls /usr/lib64/libfreebl3* It's normal for /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so to not be a symlink. It shouldn't be a problem unless ldconfig locates another file which it will try to use as the target of a symlink. Once you locate the other file, you can either remove the package that provides it (or remove the file if there is no such package) or ignore the error.
- Previous message: [CentOS] ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libfreebl3.so is not a symbolic link
- Next message: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0112 Critical CentOS 5 i386 firefox Update
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list