[CentOS] more software raid questions

Tom H tomh0665 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 19 22:34:18 EDT 2010


On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:59 PM, fred smith
<fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote:
>
> back in Aug several of you assisted me in solving a problem where one
> of my drives had dropped out of (or been kicked out of) the raid1 array.
>
> something vaguely similar appears to have happened just a few mins ago,
> upon rebooting after a small update. I received four emails like this,
> one for /dev/md0, one for /dev/md1, one for /dev/md125 and one for
> /dev/md126:
>
>        Subject: DegradedArray event on /dev/md125:fcshome.stoneham.ma.us
>        X-Spambayes-Classification: unsure; 0.24
>        Status: RO
>        Content-Length: 564
>        Lines: 23
>
>        This is an automatically generated mail message from mdadm
>        running on fcshome.stoneham.ma.us
>
>        A DegradedArray event had been detected on md device /dev/md125.
>
>        Faithfully yours, etc.
>
>        P.S. The /proc/mdstat file currently contains the following:
>
>        Personalities : [raid1]
>        md0 : active raid1 sda1[0]
>              104320 blocks [2/1] [U_]
>
>        md126 : active raid1 sdb1[1]
>              104320 blocks [2/1] [_U]
>
>        md125 : active raid1 sdb2[1]
>              312464128 blocks [2/1] [_U]
>
>        md1 : active raid1 sda2[0]
>              312464128 blocks [2/1] [U_]
>
>        unused devices: <none>
>
> firstly, what the heck are md125 and md126? previously there was
> only md0 and md1.... ????
>
> secondly, I'm not sure what it's trying to tell me. it says there was a
> "degradedarray event" but at the bottom it says there are no unused devices.
>
> there are also some messages in /var/log/messages from the time of the
> boot earlier today, but they do NOT say anything about "kicking out"
> any of the md member devices (as they did in the event back in August):
>
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: device-mapper: dm-raid45: initialized v0.2594l
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: autorun ...
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: considering sdb2 ...
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md:  adding sdb2 ...
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: sdb1 has different UUID to sdb2
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: sda2 has same UUID but different superblock
>        to sdb2
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: sda1 has different UUID to sdb2
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: created md125
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: bind<sdb2>
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: running: <sdb2>
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: raid1: raid set md125 active with 1 out of 2 mir
>        rors
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: considering sdb1 ...
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md:  adding sdb1 ...
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: sda2 has different UUID to sdb1
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: sda1 has same UUID but different superblock
>        to sdb1
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: created md126
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: bind<sdb1>
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: running: <sdb1>
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: raid1: raid set md126 active with 1 out of 2 mirrors
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: considering sda2 ...
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md:  adding sda2 ...
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: sda1 has different UUID to sda2
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: created md1
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: bind<sda2>
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: running: <sda2>
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: raid1: raid set md1 active with 1 out of 2 mirrors
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: considering sda1 ...
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md:  adding sda1 ...
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: created md0
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: bind<sda1>
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: running: <sda1>
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: raid1: raid set md0 active with 1 out of 2 mirrors
>        Oct 19 18:29:41 fcshome kernel: md: ... autorun DONE.
>
> and here's /etc/mdadm.conf:
>
>        # cat /etc/mdadm.conf
>
>        # mdadm.conf written out by anaconda
>        DEVICE partitions
>        MAILADDR fredex
>        ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=2 uuid=4eb13e45:b5228982:f03cd503:f935bd69
>        ARRAY /dev/md1 level=raid1 num-devices=2 uuid=5c79b138:e36d4286:df9cf6f6:62ae1f12
>
> which doesn't say anything about md125 or md126,... might they be some kind of detritus
> or fragments left over from whatever kind of failure caused the array to become degraded?

The superblocks in sdb1 and sdb2 is different from the superblocks in
sda1 and sda2 so mdadm assembled sdb1 and sdb2 into different arrays.
I'd have expected them to be md126 and md127 not md125 and md126 bu
that's normal.

Your problem is that all four arrays are degraded.

Which ones are mounted? Assuming that you're running off the drives
with the most recent changes and updates, you'll have to stop the two
unused arrays, zero the superblocks, and add them to the running
arrays.


More information about the CentOS mailing list