[CentOS] faster fsck ?
przemolicc at poczta.fm
przemolicc at poczta.fmFri Oct 29 09:42:38 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] How to access one machine behind iptables, on different subnet?
- Next message: [CentOS] faster fsck ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, we have CentOS ftp server (vsftpd) which has a lot of users who are writing and reading a lot of small files from/into its own accounts (and other servers - using samba client - are reading these files and putting them into outside database). Since this server is under heavy load its availability is important. >From time to time we "crash" this server (don't ask why ...) but then fsck is running for over 20-30 minuts. The question is: is there any other _stable_ filesystem (xfs ?, jfs ?) which we can use instead of ext3 which is (quite) immune to crashes and whose fsck is "faster" (by design) then in ext3 ? Regards Przemek ---------------------------------------------- Chcesz wiÄcej zarabiaÄ? ZmieĹ pracÄ na lepszÄ ! http://linkint.pl/f2822
- Previous message: [CentOS] How to access one machine behind iptables, on different subnet?
- Next message: [CentOS] faster fsck ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list