[CentOS] How can a company help, officially?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Mon Apr 11 20:37:28 UTC 2011
On 4/11/2011 2:59 PM, Tru Huynh wrote:
>
>>> Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report back
>>> what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ?
>>
>> So having everyone repeat the same mistakes with no coordination is your
>> idea of doing things faster?
> who is everyone?
I might throw some time and equipment at it if I knew I wasn't
re-inventing square wheels (or even round ones for that matter). And I
suspect that others smarter than I am would do the same and maybe even
improve the approach by coming up with ways to predict the build
environment needed to reproduce a given binary to reduce the
trial-and-error time. But I don't see this happening if the process
stays closed any more than I think there would be a useful Linux today -
or most of the packages comprising Red Hat's product - if development
had not been open and shared.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the CentOS
mailing list