[CentOS] Dag's RHEL Rebuild Project.

[Ian Murray]

----- Original Message ----
> From: "aurfalien at gmail.com" <aurfalien at gmail.com>
> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
> Sent: Tue, 12 April, 2011 20:10:14
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dag's RHEL Rebuild Project.
> 
> On Apr 12, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Ian Murray wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >>  This is really disrespectful to talk about on  here. The devs spent  
> >> a ton of
> >> their spare time to develop centos, last  thing  you should talk  
> >> about is
> >> starting  competing projects...
> >>
> >> Peter.
> >
> > I really  don't get this list. The threads I have read on the Xen  
> > list  suggest
> > there is no problem with a discussion about the relative merits  of  
> > KVM so why is
> > everything so personal on this list?  Something quite unhealthy is  
> > going on here,
> >  IMHO.
> 
> Its not that at all (to me).
> 
> Then again the Xen lists don't  have ppl whining about a missed rel  
> date with personal attaches about  leadership.

I guess people are pretty happy with the way the Xen project is run.

> 
> The guys maintaining Centos have ownership of the project  which  
> results in a sense of pride and personal feelings about  it.

They have every right to be pride; no doubt a phenomenal amount of work goes 
into CentOS and I don't think there is much/any gripe on this list of the 
quality of the finished article. But of course, pride can be an inhibitor as 
well..


> 
> Plus, I think it was the timing of the post regarding DAGs RHEL  like  
> project.

Tensions are indeed running high, so yeah.

> 
> There is an order of magnitude more traffic on  this list then on the  
> Xen list.

Erm, jury's out for me as to whether that would make a difference or not.

> 
> -  aurf
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing  list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>