[CentOS] [Thank you!] IMHO only RHEL is better than CentOS...
Calvin Webster
cwebster at ec.rr.comWed Apr 13 12:57:10 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] [Thank you!] IMHO only RHEL is better than CentOS...
- Next message: [CentOS] audio recorder compatibility
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 02:09 +0100, Christopher J. Buckley wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 21:43, Cal Webster <cwebster at ec.rr.com> wrote: > > Also, the upstream vendor provides no economical > > way to mirror RHEL updates on isolated networks - Satellite is out of > > the question. RHEL 4 updates must be painstakingly retrieved manually, > > one at a time, on the "Internet machine" before transport and > > distribution to internal networks > > Why not purchase RHN Proxy instead? > Prohibitively expensive for our budget. We'd have to purchase 2 (one external/internet and 1 internal/intranet) and I'd still have to sneakernet the data and sync.
- Previous message: [CentOS] [Thank you!] IMHO only RHEL is better than CentOS...
- Next message: [CentOS] audio recorder compatibility
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list