[CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

[Karanbir Singh]

On 02/02/2011 05:22 PM, Larry Vaden wrote:
> What is RH's be-all end-all justification for staying with an ancient
> code base for such important programs as BIND et al?

Did you ask them ? what did they say ?

> Is there any support among the CentOS community for a REPO of current
> vintage for such important functions as BIND et al?

you mean like the bind97 available in c5-testing right now, that should 
be in 5.6 soon ?


- KB