[CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!
Johnny Hughes
johnny at centos.org
Tue Feb 22 22:56:41 UTC 2011
On 02/22/2011 02:35 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> Calling it Enterprise is important because doing so establishes the
>> *origin* and the *objective* of the work: a BUG-FOR-BUG-IDENTICAL
>> de-branding/re-branding of Red Hat ENTERPRISE Linux.
>
>
> How about BugforbugIdenticaldebreandingrebrandingofupstreamenterpriselinuxOS?
>
> Only joking. I take your point, but the critical fixes being held up for a dot
> release isn't really very Enterprise friendly either. I think it fair to say
> that CentOS is not suitable for the enterprise unless the servers are
> non-public, on a secure network and the risk of internal hacking is low. That is
> just an unfortunate nature of a rebuild project but it does make the release
> time a sensitive matter.
>
> Karanbir tweeted during FOSDEM that the Belgian police use CentOS. As everyone
> who is paying attention knows that any exploit that RedHat has released an
> updated package for post is 5.6 is sat waiting to be exploited on those police
> servers because it won't make the CentOS repositories until 5.6 is out. I wonder
> if the Belgian police know that.
>
> So.... if anybody can be bothered to check the errata from upstream and want to
> do some mischief.....fill your boots...
>
> http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://www.polfed-fedpol.be
>
>
>>
>>> If you can't adjust the release time, then adjust the expectations.
>>
>> We have: It's done when it's done. That's what we expect, and that's
>> what we get. On time, every time.
>
>
> I did think about that when when I made my earlier comment. The trouble is is
> that it obviously isn't working because we have these list flame-ups.
I think 8 million unique machines disagree with you assessment. Who
knows, maybe all 8 million are wrong and the 10-20 people who are
discussing it on this list are right.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110222/75fabc21/attachment.sig>
More information about the CentOS
mailing list