[CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

[Rob Kampen]

Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/12/2011 01:08 AM, Mark Bradbury wrote:
>   
>>     >
>>     > Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less
>>     > complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ?
>>     >
>>     > And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1
>>     would
>>     > take no more than 1 month ?
>>
>>     Get over yourself Dag ... for goodness sake.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Why? seems like a valid point to me.
>>     
>
> 1.  Have you, or anyone else, noticed the speed of the CentOS-5 and
> CentOS-4 updates recently?  We have spread out the building and checking
> up updates .. there has been a marked improvement is release speed for
> updates.
>   
Yes - noted and appreciated
> 2.  Have you, or anyone else, noticed that we have started pushing out
> the upstream EL Fastrack channel for CentOS-5.  In CentOS it is named
> fasttrack (spelling) on our end due to upstream IP restrictions.
>
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/fasttrack/
>   
Yes noted
> 3.  Have you, or anyone else, noticed the QA tracking site that is open
> to the public?
>
> http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/
>
> There is a dashboard of recent events:
>
> http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/dashboard
>
> There is even an RSS feed:
>
> http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/feed
>
> Most of the names who are posting there and taking action are NOT CentOS
> Project guys, but community people ... isn't that what people were
> asking for?
>   
Yes - I even saw a calendar with some target and milestones
> 4.  Have you, or anyone else, noticed the aggregated list of status
> announcements that we now have?  The forum moderators are great and they
> have started an announcement forum area where they aggregate important
> information:
>
> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewforum.php?forum=53
>
>
> ==================================================
>
> It does not seem to matter what we try to do,  what we get is petty
> comments about how nothing changes.  Nothing could be further from the
> truth.
>   
Please note there is a largely silent majority that appreciates very 
much what the team does, is doing to improve and listening to suggestions
Keep up the great work - Thanks
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>   
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: rkampen.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 337 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110512/32ed5f4c/attachment.vcf>