[CentOS] What happened to 6.1

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Tue Nov 15 22:47:24 UTC 2011



Am 15.11.2011 23:43, schrieb John R. Dennison:
>>
>> I was wondering if it would be safe to just stay with the 'standard'
>> repo for centos and wait for 6.1 that way or do you suggest adding the
>> CR repo as a necessary event?
> 
> Depends on if you feel that security updates are important to your
> infrastructure.

but why in the world is an extra repo needed for security-updates?
it is like a bad joke installing a os and have to search how
to install a repo for ESSENTIAL updates while most people
think "i have a package manager and get updates"

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20111115/6beea3a1/attachment.sig>


More information about the CentOS mailing list