[CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)
Akemi Yagi
amyagi at gmail.comTue Nov 15 02:39:51 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)
- Next message: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Alan McKay <alan.mckay at gmail.com> wrote: > Basically from what I gather, while Red Hat cannot restrict access to > sources, they can restrict access to binaries. And since CentOS has a > goal of binary compatibility with upstream, they are essentially left > trying to hit an unknown target. But (now I'm stretching my limited > knowledge even further) Scientific does not have this restriction > since they are less concerned about exact binary compat. You are stretching your knowledge to a wrong direction :) Both CentOS and Scientific Linux *aim* at 100% binary compatibility and they are both doing their best toward that goal. However, neither is perfect. http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-November/119250.html Akemi
- Previous message: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)
- Next message: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS (was: What happened to 6.1)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list