[CentOS] compare zfs xfs and jfs o

[ashkab rahmani]

thank you. very usefull
i think i'll try btrfs or jfs,
i'll send you btrfs result for you.

On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote:

> On 04.08.2012 15:19, ashkab rahmani wrote:
> > thank you i have redundancy but i have simplified scenario.
> > but i think ext4 is notbas fast as others. is it true?
> >
> > ———
> > Ashkan R
> > On Aug 4, 2012 6:39 PM, "Nux!" <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote:
> >
> >> On 04.08.2012 15:01, ashkab rahmani wrote:
> >> > hello
> >> > i have 16tb storage. 8x2tb sata raided.
> >> > i want to share it on network via nfs.
> >> > which file system is better for it?
> >> > thank you
> >> > ———
> >> > Ashkan R
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > CentOS mailing list
> >> > CentOS at centos.org
> >> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >>
> >> No redundancy? That's a lot of data to lose. :-)
> >>
> >> As for your question, I'd use ext4. It has caught up a lot with XFS
> >> and
> >> it's THE file system supported by RHEL and Fedora.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >>
> >> Nux!
> >> www.nux.ro
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CentOS mailing list
> >> CentOS at centos.org
> >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS at centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> Well, I think ext4 is pretty fast. Maybe XFS has a slight edge over it
> in some scenarios.
> ZFS on linux is still highly experimental and has received close to no
> testing.
> If you are in mood for experiments EL6.3 includes BTRFS as technology
> preview for 64bit machines. Give it a try and let us know how it goes.
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>