[CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo

[wwp]

Hello Johan,


On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:02:16 +0100 Johan Vermeulen <jvermeulen at cawdekempen.be> wrote:

> Dear All,
> 
> I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
> * I then have a Selinux module
> * Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea, because I'd have to leave the Testing-repo enabled.
> 
> I tried installing from Libreoffice.org before, but got into trouble when logging in with ssh -X and
> then opening LibreOffice.

Well, if the packages are available in Testing-repo, I vote for this
solution too, even if I will check-update manually (with --enablerepo
and libreoffice package name). Because there won't be updates too often,
and because I'll let testing-repo disabled here by default.


Regards,

> On 27-02-12 09:00, wwp wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:03:11 +0100 Vnpenguin<vnpenguin at vnoss.org>  wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 20:54, Ljubomir Ljubojevic<office at plnet.rs>  wrote:
> >>> On 02/26/2012 12:34 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >>>> You can use Libre Office directly from libreoffice.org ... I do.
> >> Yep, rpms LO from libreoffice.org work very well on my CentOS box.
> > Same here. Download'ed .tgz from libreoffice.org, unpacked and
> > installed the .rpm I wanted (help, languages, core stuff), integrated
> > to the GNOME desktop and works like a charm.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS at centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

-- 
wwp
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20120227/2211c1df/attachment.sig>