[CentOS] Centos 6.X compatible to ORACLE DB verssion????

Thu Jan 5 06:15:24 UTC 2012
An Yang <an.euroford at gmail.com>

At 2012-01-04 Wed 09:53 -0600,Johnny Hughes wrote: 

> On 01/04/2012 04:29 AM, Christopher J. Buckley wrote:
> > 2012/1/4 An Yang <an.euroford at gmail.com>
> >
> >> Somebody in Oracle told me, they need one year to test, I'm not sure,
> >> it's true or not.
> >>
> > That's about right. The testing isn't done by Oracle btw, it's done by the
> > end vendor.
> >
> >
> The "end vendor" submitted the information to Oracle months ago:
> 
> http://www.redhat.com/about/news/blog/Red-Hat-Submits-Oracle-11gR2-on-Red-Hat-Enterprise-Linux-6-Certification-Test-Results-to-Oracle
> 

Greate!
"end vendor" people said, Consequently, we confidently recommend the
deployment of Oracle 11gR2 in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 production
environments today. 

> Oracle does not want to support ASMLib on any kernel other than OEL (or
> UBL if you prefer):
> 
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv6-list/2011-December/msg00032.html
> 
> The bottom line is that Oracle IS going to try to drive people to their
> version of Linux and off RHEL.
> 
> But I know, I am just be paranoid or some other such thing.  Right
> Christopher?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: ???????????
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20120105/d9459c91/attachment-0005.sig>