[CentOS] XEN or KVM - performance/stability/security?
Gordon Messmer
yinyang at eburg.comFri Jul 13 22:52:38 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS] XEN or KVM - performance/stability/security?
- Next message: [CentOS] QT menu decorations missing on Centos 6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 07/08/2012 08:47 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > There are other Xen-based virtualization solutions out there aswell with full support. That's true, but I'm guessing that a lot of people on this list are here specifically because they're not paying for support. Whether that's true or not, if you're deploying virtualization *on CentOS*, KVM is really the only rational choice. Xen hosting support is no longer a part of new releases.
- Previous message: [CentOS] XEN or KVM - performance/stability/security?
- Next message: [CentOS] QT menu decorations missing on Centos 6
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list