[CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]
Keith Roberts
keith at karsites.net
Sun Jun 24 16:47:37 UTC 2012
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012, ken wrote:
*snip*
> Yeah, the problem is more than likely in your hardware. I've used it on
> hundreds of machines and since 1999 and never had a problem traceable to
> LVM. On the other hand, I've seen a lot of disks go bad.
And what happens then in that situation - do you loose any
more data than you would loose with 'standard' primary and
extended logical partitions, or does using LVM help in
recovering more data from a bad disk?
Keith
-----------------------------------------------------------
Websites:
http://www.karsites.net
http://www.php-debuggers.net
http://www.raised-from-the-dead.org.uk
All email addresses are challenge-response protected with
TMDA [http://tmda.net]
-----------------------------------------------------------
More information about the CentOS
mailing list