[CentOS] "upstream" Storage Server fully OSS?
nux at li.nux.ro
Wed Nov 21 09:51:08 UTC 2012
On 20.11.2012 01:15, Ted Miller wrote:
> On 11/19/2012 12:12 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Ted Miller<tedlists at sbcglobal.net>
>>> If RHSS is not available or suitable, other suggestions welcome. I
>>> need a
>>> file system/server with:
>>> * primary function is serving MP3 files for playback in a radio
>>> environment in Haiti
>>> * if the system goes down all your clients (listeners) know
>>> * they know it NOW
>>> * they know how long it takes to get it back up
>>> * High Availability as the primary concern
>>> * ability to administrate via web interface or similar by
>>> IT staff.
>>> * ability to grow file system from 2-3TB to 20-50TB by simply
>>> adding disks
>>> and/or adding 'bricks'
>>> * clients will all be Windows computers, so files accessible by
>>> * critical application is read-only
>>> * prefer a system that would continue serving files even if the
>>> goes down (but have not found such a system yet for Windows
>> Is it possible to change the application so it uses http to get
>> content or uses a distributed database natively? Distributed
>> failure-tolerant systems are a lot easier if you don't even try to
>> provide filesystem semantics that require a lot of atomic
> Application is commercial, not changeable. It wants to see a local
> if possible. Will tolerate (with warnings) a network share. Most of
> critical operations are read-only (play back a file on the air).
Then it looks like GlusterFS is your only choice. Otherwise Openstack
Swift might have worked, too, if it hadn't been HTTP only.
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
More information about the CentOS