[CentOS] Routing issue

Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
Wed Oct 10 08:53:00 EDT 2012


On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Steve Clark <sclark at netwolves.com> wrote:
>
>>>> I was trying to figure out what criteria to use to mark the connection.
>>>> FTP is such a
>>>> braindead application, using to channels and active and passive mode.
>>>> What really
>>>> needs to happen is someway to tell the kernel to recheck the routing
>>>> after SNAT.
>>> I'm mostly sure that if you mark the *connection* to the FTP server, the
>>> related data will follow its path.
>>>
>>> Again, multipath routing is complex, and Shorewall will do it properly.
>>>     At the very least, I recommend building a working configuration with
>>> Shorewall and then reading the rules that it compiles to understand why
>>> it handles routing the way that it does.
>> Steve, what you need is to send packages of particular stream via
>> particular ISP in situation where stupid load balancing will brake a
>> connection, send it via different ISP and thus change the clients IP.
>>
>> Shorewall and it's Multi-ISP config is only thing you need for this to work.
>>
>>
> Hi Ljubomir,
>
> Thanks for the response. We have 450 units in the field and have only needed to do this at one site. I am
> using a userspace script to monitor the viability of each isp and changing the routing accordingly as
> described in the LARTC document. Our units in the field use CentOS so we don't want to use a
> custom kernel outside of what CentOS provides. That's why I am reluctant to use the patches at
>
> http://www.ssi.bg/~ja
>

If you have a squid parked somewhere with working internet routing, a
quick-fix would be to export ftp_proxy=http://squid_ip:port before
running yum (or whatever is using ftp).   You can even port-forward
this over an ssh connection if your squid proxy can't be reached
directly.

-- 
    Les Mikesell
      lesmikesell at gmail.com


More information about the CentOS mailing list