[CentOS] Slightly OT: Red Hat vs Twin Peaks
Jake Shipton
jakems at fedoraproject.orgMon Sep 17 17:46:03 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS] Slightly OT: Red Hat vs Twin Peaks
- Next message: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 91, Issue 11
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:11:41 -0400 Mark LaPierre <marklapier at aol.com> wrote: > > > Interesting story at Groklaw...just thought I would share: > > http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20120913073511444 > I find that quite amusing :-D. TwinPeaks "Let's Sue a company that's a lot bigger than us!" Redhat "Ha, you can do that, but while you do, We are going to counter sue as you are copying GPL code, and not keeping to the license! :-) Have a nice day" Sorry, but this one truly deserves a "FAIL!" (to TwinPeaks) Haha :-). Thanks for the laughs :-). -- Jake Shipton (JakeMS) GPG Key: 0xE3C31D8F GPG Fingerprint: 7515 CC63 19BD 06F9 400A DE8A 1D0B A5CF E3C3 1D8F -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 490 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20120917/a806a8a7/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] Slightly OT: Red Hat vs Twin Peaks
- Next message: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 91, Issue 11
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list