[CentOS] what's wrong with dag.wieers?
Leon Fauster
leonfauster at googlemail.com
Wed Jul 3 13:23:46 UTC 2013
Am 03.07.2013 um 15:10 schrieb Pete Geenhuizen <pete at geenhuizen.net>:
> On 07/03/2013 08:34 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> On Tue, July 2, 2013 17:34, John Hinton wrote:
>>
>> Ditto here, and for the same reasons.
>>
>> This was our experience as well; changing userids between clam and
>> clamav between updates caused us a lot of avoidable headaches. We
>> switched to epel for clamav because of that one issue. Otherwise we
>> have been very pleased with rpmforge. It will prove a great loss if
>> there is a serious possibility that this resource might fade away.
>>
>>
> Fading away is a distinct possibility.
> David Hrbac, who is trying to maintain rpmforge had this to say on that
> subject.
>
> "And of course, there's still a question about the Repoforge. Do we
> really want it? Isn't a time for Epel to replace Repoforge? I still want
> to keep Repoforge alive bud have no replies from Dag."
for an assessment of such statements is the context essential (Subject: Clamav)
http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/2013-July/thread.html
--
LF
More information about the CentOS
mailing list