[CentOS] ReiserFS - status?
John R Pierce
pierce at hogranch.com
Tue May 21 17:15:24 UTC 2013
On 5/21/2013 5:55 AM, Yves S. Garret wrote:
> http://www.serverfocus.org/reiserfs-vs-ext4-vs-xfs-vs-zfs-vs-btrfs
>
> ...
> In the above link you can find comparisons between the various file systems,
> their advantages and disadvantages. Perhaps you can find something more
> contemporary that can help you?
pretty good summary, but I take issue with the XFS summary statement,
"If you really like to tweak your system to meet your needs, XFS is a
great way to go.". XFS requires no tweaking at all, just `mkfs.xfs
/dev/vg_bigdata/lvwhatever` and mount and go. Its not suitable as the
root file system for CentOS (mostly because Anaconda doesn't know how to
set it up), but for data volumes, its king. only caveat is, the
system MUST be 64bit, and you should have a fair amount of RAM to ensure
xfs_check can handle the bajillions of files and links likely to
accumulate on larger volumes.
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast
More information about the CentOS
mailing list