[CentOS] died again
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Tue Nov 26 17:58:04 UTC 2013
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Michael Hennebry
<hennebry at web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu> wrote:
>>> It is getting long in the tooth. (I'm about to replace my m/b of the same
>> vintage at home.)
>
> Ouch.
> $200+ before installation,
> and I'd still have a computer some Linuxes don't like.
Yeah, probably better to get something that is likely to run for 10
more years than to squeeze another year out of something old.
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>> I've seen a machine where it took 3+ days of running memtest86 to
>> catch the error. And then after replacing the RAM, the machine still
>
> Clean bill from memtest86 running overnight.
Like I said, I had one that ran clean for 3 days, then caught the
intermittent RAM error that was causing the problem. But, if I hadn't
already had a pile of similar RAM to swap in, I would probably have
been ahead to trash the old box anyway. It just happened to be the
only large tower case I had with an 8 port SATA controller and room
for a lot of disks and I like using it for backups.
> The memory is the newest part of the computer.
> After rebooting, it crapped out twice in half an hour.
> After that, I went back to F14.
Are you saying it never crashes with fedora but it does with centos?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the CentOS
mailing list