[CentOS] NetworkManager substitute??

Fred Smith fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us
Mon Oct 28 23:53:13 UTC 2013


On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 07:41:59PM -0400, SilverTip257 wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote:
> 
> > On 28.10.2013 17:52, Fred Smith wrote:
> > > I'm investigating how to setup KVM so I can run VMs without having to
> > > use
> > > VirtualBox or VMware, or etc.
> > >
> > > All the HOWTOs I see tell you to disable NM.
> >
> 
> There is no reason to disable NM entirely.
> 
> But you can disable NM per interface with:
> NM_CONTROLLED="no"

Yes, so I've learned today. thanks for the tip though.

> I've seen it is common practice to disable NM on bridge and other
> interfaces at times.
> 
> I expect this excerpt from [0] is why I've seen NM disabled "per interface"
> in various write-ups.
> And in my case I never needed or wanted NM fiddling with most interfaces on
> my headless servers. ;)

Sure. makes sense. But I'm hoping to use this on my main (home) desktop
machine, so I need to still have desktop-likke services available.

> 
> 
>    - The NM_CONTROLLED=no should be added to the Ethernet interface to
>    prevent *NetworkManager* from altering the file. It can also be added to
>    the bridge configuration file in case future versions of
> *NetworkManager* support
>    bridge configuration.
> 

thanks for the info!

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Under no circumstances will I ever purchase anything offered to me as
    the result of an unsolicited e-mail message. Nor will I forward chain
    letters, petitions, mass mailings, or virus warnings to large numbers
    of others. This is my contribution to the survival of the online
    community.
 --Roger Ebert, December, 1996
----------------------------- The Boulder Pledge -----------------------------



More information about the CentOS mailing list