Steve Clark wrote: > On 07/14/2014 11:26 AM, William Woods wrote: >> On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:19 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> William Woods wrote: >>> >>> Please stop top posting. >>>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>>> William Woods wrote: >>>>>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning <centos at u62.u22.net> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 06:42 -0400, Steve Clark wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Having been working with UNIX like systems since 1985 >>>>>>>> my biggest complaint with systemd is it so intrusive, it wants to >>>>>>>> be everything which makes it vulnerable to bugs and exploits - >>>>>>>> umm.. like Windoze! >>>>>>>> My $.02 >>>>>>> + $ 10.00 :-) >>>>>> Because UNIX has never had a bug or exploit right ? >>>>>> >>>>> Well... we know that > 50% of the Web and 'Net runs on Linux and >>>>> other unices. Compare and contrast the number of Windows Server >>>>> vulnerabilities that have been exploited to those of *Nix... and, >>>>> for extra credit, how fast they were admitted, and fixed..... >>>>> >>>> Like OpenSSL ? >>> I suggest you google with the following search criteria: "windows >>> server" exploits >>> >> Sigh, nothing like a zealot. ALL OS's have vulns and exploits, no matter >> what you decide to believe. >> > Sigh, nothing like someone who is in a constant state of deniability. > Replying to this, because I saw a reply from him, but there was no new content, for some reason. Anyway, he also seems determined to see it all as black and white, rather than looking at the *much* larger set of bugs and vulnerabilities that Windows Server has had than any version of 'Nix. Sure, we have some... but a *lot* fewer, and overwhelmingly far less serious. mark