<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>RE: [Centos] Linux 2.6 Kernel</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>That might be a nice option for a testing branch, but wouldn't implementing a 2.6 kernel option go against the Centos 3 objective of reimplementing RHEL 3? Some of the 2.6 kernel enhancements have been backported in the Redhat EL kernel, if I understand correctly. Check out: <A HREF="https://www.redhat.com/apps/webform.html?event_type=whitepaper&eid=278" TARGET="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/apps/webform.html?event_type=whitepaper&eid=278</A></FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Lynn, Jim [<A HREF="mailto:Jim.Lynn@conocophillips.com">mailto:Jim.Lynn@conocophillips.com</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 5:53 PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: centos@caosity.org</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: [Centos] Linux 2.6 Kernel</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Are there plans to implement the 2.6 kernel??</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>