<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
If your seeing the communication like this its not being dumped or
dropped by your firewall, you could add an accept rule for all
protocols from the far end Ips at each site, just for debugging
purposes and to rule out the firewall itself..<br>
<br>
This is almost there now, make sure that you have lines like this in
your firewall:<br>
<br>
$IPTABLES -A RESTRICT_EXTERNAL_CONNECTIONS -m state --state
ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT<br>
$IPTABLES -A RESTRICT_EXTERNAL_CONNECTIONS -m state --state NEW
--in-interface ! $EXT_IFACE -j ACCEPT<br>
<br>
$IPTABLES -A INPUT -j RESTRICT_EXTERNAL_CONNECTIONS<br>
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -j RESTRICT_EXTERNAL_CONNECTIONS<br>
<br>
Notice I accept all new interfaces on anything that's not the external
network card, this automatically includes lo, internet ethernet and all
ipsec interfaces you will of course need to change these to suit your
firewall config....<br>
<br>
Becareful (dont use it unmodified) using a rule like this if you have
more than one external [untrusted] interface....<br>
<br>
<br>
P.<br>
<br>
<br>
simone wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid1116940212.6046.43.camel@fbctestvpn">
<pre wrap="">Hi there. Installed openswan, and followed the instructions :) . It
looks like tunnel is estabilished now:
May 24 14:19:33 fbctestvpn pluto[7063]: "milan" #1: initiating Main Mode
May 24 14:19:33 fbctestvpn pluto[7063]: | no IKE algorithms for this
connection ---> is this bad....
May 24 14:19:33 fbctestvpn pluto[7063]: "milan" #1: transition from
state STATE_MAIN_I1 to state STATE_MAIN_I2
May 24 14:19:33 fbctestvpn pluto[7063]: "milan" #1: received Vendor ID
payload [XAUTH]
May 24 14:19:33 fbctestvpn pluto[7063]: "milan" #1: received Vendor ID
payload [Dead Peer Detection]
May 24 14:19:33 fbctestvpn pluto[7063]: "milan" #1: received Vendor ID
payload [Cisco-Unity]
May 24 14:19:33 fbctestvpn pluto[7063]: "milan" #1: ignoring unknown
Vendor ID payload [xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
May 24 14:19:33 fbctestvpn pluto[7063]: "milan" #1: I did not send a
certificate because I do not have one.
May 24 14:19:33 fbctestvpn pluto[7063]: "milan" #1: transition from
state STATE_MAIN_I2 to state STATE_MAIN_I3
May 24 14:19:33 fbctestvpn pluto[7063]: "milan" #1: Main mode peer ID is
ID_IPV4_ADDR: 'xxx.xxx.xxx.130' --> this being the external ip of the
cisco pix 525
May 24 14:19:33 fbctestvpn pluto[7063]: "milan" #1: transition from
state STATE_MAIN_I3 to state STATE_MAIN_I4
May 24 14:19:33 fbctestvpn pluto[7063]: "milan" #1: ISAKMP SA
established
May 24 14:19:33 fbctestvpn pluto[7063]: "milan" #2: initiating Quick
Mode PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+UP {using isakmp#1}
May 24 14:19:33 fbctestvpn pluto[7063]: "milan" #1: ignoring
informational payload, type IPSEC_INITIAL_CONTACT
May 24 14:19:33 fbctestvpn pluto[7063]: "milan" #1: received and ignored
informational message
May 24 14:19:33 fbctestvpn pluto[7063]: "milan" #2: ignoring
informational payload, type IPSEC_RESPONDER_LIFETIME
May 24 14:19:33 fbctestvpn pluto[7063]: "milan" #2: transition from
state STATE_QUICK_I1 to state STATE_QUICK_I2
May 24 14:19:33 fbctestvpn pluto[7063]: "milan" #2: sent QI2, IPsec SA
established {ESP=>0x6xxx23f <0x07xxxx7}
000 "milan":
192.168.10.0/24===xxx.xxx.xxx.90---xxx.xxx.xxx.65...xxx.xxx.xxx.129---xxx.xxx.xxx.130===192.168.100.0/24; unrouted; eroute owner: #0
192.168.10.3 internal linux box ip (and default gateway for the natted
workstations)
192.168.100.2 internal cisco pix ip (and default gateway for the natted
workstations)
conn milan
left=xxx.xxx.xxx.90 public ip linux box
leftnexthop=xxx.xxx.xxx.65 default gateway linux
leftsubnet=192.168.10.0/24
right=xxx.xxx.xxx.130 public ip cisco
rightsubnet=192.168.100.0/24 network behind cisco
rightnexthop=xxx.xxx.xxx.129 default gateway cisco
authby=secret
pfs=no
auto=add
esp=3des-md5-96
The firewall on the linuxbox is natting the 192.168.10.x network and
accepting anything coming from 192.168.100.x, I added udp port 500 to
INPUT and OUTPUT chains in iptables, but still cannot ping (even from
other workstations) or reach a web page on the other network. Anything
else I am missing or should be looking for?
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Remember you will need to allow the ipsec interface in your firewall
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->How do I do this?
Thanks for all your help, really appreciate this.
Simone
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 01:35, Peter Farrow wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi there, yes it was with a Nortel contivity on a few occassions and
the other times with a Cisco pix. interstingly enough the Cisco VPNs
often required updates to the IOS to make them 3Des compliant,
As its late here in the UK (past midnight GMT+1) here is a very quick
and dirty freeswan guide.
Needless to say the things that cause the biggest headache for most
users is the use of RSA keys and opportunistic encryption. Since this
is NOT what 99.9% of the masses need or want then there is a quick and
simple and just as secure alternative setup, but its not that well
documented. Opportunistic encryption came in versions 2 and above of
freeswan by default, this has the effect of clobbering the network
default route and replacing it down the ipsec interface (what you want
if you want to encrypt everything, but not really any great use in the
real world). Most people want to do site <-> site vpns and these are
best achieved without opportunistic encryption and by the use of
preshared keys.
1)Make sure you get a version of freeswan suitable for your kernel, if
you can't find one go to somewhere like rpms.pbone.net and find a
kernel for which there is a freeswan version. Many people try and
hunt a freeswan version to match their kernel, I do it the otherway
round, find the latest freeswan compatible kernel you can for your
architecture, you can always compile it from source but why my life
harder for yourself.
2)get the freeswan module for the kernel you found, and the same
freeswan-userland version as well. then proceed as follows: after you
have installed the [from rpm]
Typically to kill opportunistic encryption add these lines to your
ipsec.conf file: after the config setup section near the top,
conn block
auto=ignore
conn private
auto=ignore
conn private-or-clear
auto=ignore
conn clear-or-private
auto=ignore
conn clear
auto=ignore
conn packetdefault
auto=ignore
Doing this stops all the crap you get when ipsec starts and then kicks
you off the system about 60 seconds later if you're connected remotely
as this kills the opportunistic setup feature. Do the same at the
other end as well.
Then start the service.
Then add a section for each tunnel you want to set up. if you have
multiple subnets at each site which can't be encapsulated in a single
subnet declaration, you will need to add a new tunnel defintion for
each. Here is an example :
conn site1-site2 #this is the connection name
[tunnel] identifier
left=21.21.100.10 #This is the ip address of the
first linux box
leftnexthop=21.21.100.9 #This is usually set to the
defualt gateway for the first linux box
leftsubnet=10.11.2.0/24 #This is the LAN subnet behind
the first linux box
right=21.21.100.178 #This is the IP address of the
second linux box at the other end of the tunnel
rightsubnet=10.11.4.0/24 #This is the LAN subnet behind
the second linux box
rightnexthop=21.21.100.177 #This is the IP address of the
default gateway setting of the other linux box
authby=secret #We are going to use a
"password" or secret to encrypt/auth the link
pfs=no #Turn off perfect forward
security, this makes it faster and easier but less secure
auto=add #Authorise but don't start
esp=3des-md5-96 #encapsulating security payload
setting, encryption used for auth and data
Now cut and paste this and add it to the ipsec.conf file on the second
machine completely as is, unmodified.
Then in you /etc/ipsec.secrets file on each machine you will need to
add a password [secret] for each each of the tunnels you have
specified, in the above example we would have:
21.21.100.10 21.21.100.178 : PSK "a-passwordin-here-with-the-quotes"
Add this to the very top of the ipsec secrets file, one entry for each
pair of machines in this format
leftmachineip rightmachineip : PSK "password"
Then do a service ipsec restart on each machine, bring the link up
with this command, it only needs to be invoked from either one of the
ends
ipsec auto --up site1-site2
You should get output like this if you did it right:
ipsec auto --up site1-site2
104 "site1-site2" #2086: STATE_MAIN_I1: initiate
106 "site1-site2" #2086: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, expecting MR2
108 "site1-site2" #2086: STATE_MAIN_I3: sent MI3, expecting MR3
004 "site1-site2" #2086: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP SA established
112 "site1-site2" #2087: STATE_QUICK_I1: initiate
004 "site1-site2" #2087: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, IPsec SA
established
Remember you will need to allow the ipsec interface in your firewall
and you will need to add lines like this:
# Accept udp connections to port 500 for ipsec
$IPTABLES -A INPUT -p udp --sport 500 --dport 500 -j ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -A OUTPUT -p udp --sport 500 --dport 500 -j ACCEPT
This is just about the quickest way to set up a VPN tunnel with
Freeswan, it takes minutes. If you want to make if more secure, you
can tune the config once you get it running this way!
Remember the only machines that can't see the full extent of the other
LAN network are the linux boxes creating the tunnel. So the left
linux box will not be able to ping stuff on 10.11.4.0/24 network and
the right linux box will not be able to ping stuff on 10.11.2.0/24
network - don't forget this.... its commonly mistaken by some to mean
the tunnel isn't working, to truly test it end to end you need hosts
on the LANs at each end to ping each other.
If you want to make it work through NATing gateways you will need to
port forward the udp 500 setting above on your firewall.
Enjoy!
Pete
Kennedy Clark wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Any chance of getting a quick HOW-TO posted to the group for that?
;-) Sounds interesting.
I saw your post about using it with Cisco & Nortel equipment -- I work
with both a lot at my current customer. What types of equipment have
you used it with from both vendors (e.g., Cisco: IOS, PIX, VPN3K;
Nortel = Contivity)?
Thanks!!
Kennedy
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:CentOS@centos.org">CentOS@centos.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
--
Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.email.it/f">http://www.email.it/f</a>
Sponsor:
Bisogno di liquidità? Non devi spiegare per cosa. Fino a 4.000 € a casa tua
Clicca qui: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=2291&d=24-5">http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=2291&d=24-5</a>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:CentOS@centos.org">CentOS@centos.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>