<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<br>
<pre wrap="">>You use 'chosen' above as to suggest that there are equivalent
>alternatives. Are there - for an organization that lives
>and dies by the scheduling features and shared folders in exchange?
Samsung Contact, and Open exchange are two very capable alternatives that work natively with outlook, i.e. outlook thinks it has an exchange server at the other end...
P.
</pre>
<br>
Les Mikesell wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid1122495213.24373.125.camel@moola.futuresource.com">
<pre wrap="">On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 14:22, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I know, but I don't want to manage users on 2 servers...
What helps with that? Winbind?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">PREABMLE: The fact that you have chosen Exchange 2000 means
you are _stuck_ with Active Directory Services (ADS). Unless
you want to chuck Exchange, you are _stuck_ with keeping your
ADS.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
You use 'chosen' above as to suggest that there are equivalent
alternatives. Are there - for an organization that lives
and dies by the scheduling features and shared folders in exchange?
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">- Winbind
- Simultaneous ADS and NsDS
- ADS-NsDS Synchronization
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Is there some reason you omitted SFU from this list? Recently you
said it would work in a similar situation to act as an NIS server
with the Linux boxes as NIS clients. And by the way, does anyone
know if there are any client license fees for the things provided
by SFU?
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>