This mail is probably spam.  The original message has been attached
along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted
mail in future.  See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.

Content preview:  On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 12:48, Ralph Angenendt wrote: >
  Les Mikesell wrote: > > This mail is probably spam. The original
  message has been attached > > along with this report, so you can
  recognize or block similar unwanted > > mail in future. See
  http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. > > > > google with a
  search like this: > > "site:www.centos.org xxxxx xxxxx" > > > (where
  xxxxx are your search terms) [...] > > > > HOT_NASTY (100.0
  points)BODY: Possible porn - Hot, Nasty, Wild, Young > > LOL. Johnny,
  you young, hot, nasty and wild CentOS developer. Do you > strip your
  packages while they're fresh? > > *snicker* [...] 

Content analysis details:   (94.60 points, 5 required)
IN_REP_TO          (-0.5 points) Has a In-Reply-To header
REFERENCES         (-0.5 points) Has a valid-looking References header
EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION  (-0.5 points) BODY: Contains what looks like an email attribution
HOT_NASTY          (100.0 points)BODY: Possible porn - Hot, Nasty, Wild, Young
QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT  (-0.5 points) BODY: Contains what looks like a quoted email text
REPLY_WITH_QUOTES  (-0.5 points) Reply with quoted text
USER_AGENT_XIMIAN  (-2.9 points) Headers indicate a non-spam MUA (Ximian)


X-FS-Spam-Score: ****************************************