<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.16.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<BR>
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 17:00 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">James Bunnell wrote:</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> I was in the #centos-social channel and simply stated that I noticed</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> CentOS 3-4 were getting a lot of updates. I also stated that the CentOS</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> 5 was one kernel behind, as in RHEL it is at -53, the gentlemen then</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> told me that I was wrong and it was at -21.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">lftp ftp.redhat.com:/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS> ls kernel* > kernel.list</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">lftp ftp.redhat.com:/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS> exit</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">[angenenr@shutdown ~]$grep 53 kernel.list </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">-rw-rw-r-- 2 ftp ftp 54464006 Feb 12 14:37 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.13.el5.src.rpm</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">-rw-rw-r-- 2 ftp ftp 54492476 Mar 03 09:40 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5.src.rpm</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">-rw-rw-r-- 2 ftp ftp 54521781 May 04 07:52 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.19.el5.src.rpm</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">-rw-rw-r-- 2 ftp ftp 54540423 May 19 09:58 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.src.rpm</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">-rw-rw-r-- 2 ftp ftp 54421174 Nov 28 2007 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.4.el5.src.rpm</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">-rw-rw-r-- 2 ftp ftp 54461630 Jan 18 11:29 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.6.el5.src.rpm</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">-rw-rw-r-- 1 ftp ftp 54386174 Oct 11 2007 kernel-2.6.18-53.el5.src.rpm</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">[angenenr@shutdown ~]$</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">So which kernel would that -53 be? The one from October 11th, 2007?</FONT>
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
look like they are all -53 to me, i dont see the point.
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> I then asked if there was a way to get a progress report somehow on</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> 5.2, and that 5.2 has already upgraded that kernel. The result was</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> that I was banned for being correct. </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">a) #centos-social is not a support channel, as that channel's topic</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"> clearly states.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">b) The ban was *not* for you being correct (because you are not, 5.2</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"> will have 2.6.18-92, but for your behaviour over the last days/weeks and</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"> your *constantly* asking about progress on 5.2 (and getting the answer </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"> everybody getsdoes, see <A HREF="http://planet.centos.org/)">http://planet.centos.org/)</A>.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> I dont understand this kind of support.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">I don't understand why you came here to whine about that. &#-1;</FONT>&#-1;
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
weeks,days, ive been quiet. i believe you too have overreacted. its been nearly 2 weeks since any update of progress to 5.2 has been announced. why would that be rude or wrong to ask for? and btw, i am not the only one that has asked for an update. and ive been polite in my initial questions. response determines response.
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">Ralph</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">_______________________________________________</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">CentOS mailing list</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"><A HREF="mailto:CentOS@centos.org">CentOS@centos.org</A></FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"><A HREF="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos</A></FONT>
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>