Hi
Barry,<br><br> First of all thanx for your reply but i already used the options crossmnt,fsid=0 in my exports file still i am not able to re-export it.<br><br><br>Regards<br>lingu<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 5:30 PM, <<a href="mailto:centos-request@centos.org">centos-request@centos.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Send CentOS mailing list submissions to<br>
<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:centos-request@centos.org">centos-request@centos.org</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
<a href="mailto:centos-owner@centos.org">centos-owner@centos.org</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of CentOS digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 39, Issue 13<br>
(<a href="mailto:centos-announce-request@centos.org">centos-announce-request@centos.org</a>)<br>
2. Re: Low-memory Centos5? (Anne Wilson)<br>
3. Re: Low-memory Centos5? (Wojtek Pilorz)<br>
4. Re: Low-memory Centos5? (Max Hetrick)<br>
5. RE-export nfs mounted share (whoami i)<br>
6. Re: Low-memory Centos5? (Anne Wilson)<br>
7. Re: Low-memory Centos5? (Robert Moskowitz)<br>
8. RE: PPPoE client help (John)<br>
9. Re: kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 centosplus? (Johnny Hughes)<br>
10. Re: Low-memory Centos5? (Ned Slider)<br>
11. Re: 40 second delay on automounts with 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5<br>
kernel (Johnny Hughes)<br>
12. Config for NFSv4 an Kerberos on CentOS 5.1 (Sebastian Marten)<br>
13. Re: Low-memory Centos5? (Wojtek Pilorz)<br>
14. openafs kernel module (Markus Hetzenecker)<br>
15. RE: Low-memory Centos5? (Sorin@Gmail)<br>
16. Re: openafs kernel module (Johnny Hughes)<br>
17. Re: Config for NFSv4 an Kerberos on CentOS 5.1 (Barry Brimer)<br>
18. Re: RE-export nfs mounted share (Barry Brimer)<br>
19. Re: Low-memory Centos5? (Bob Taylor)<br>
20. servercd i386 5.1 (Jerry Geis)<br>
21. Re: CentOS 5.2 ? (Johnny Hughes)<br>
22. RE: CentOS 5.2 ? (Ross S. W. Walker)<br>
23. Re: servercd i386 5.1 (Ned Slider)<br>
24. centos on ebox (Jerry Geis)<br>
25. Re: CentOS 5.2 ? (Ned Slider)<br>
26. Re: centos on ebox (Ralph Angenendt)<br>
27. nfsnobody 65534 vs 4294967294 (David Halik)<br>
28. Re: centos on ebox (Jerry Geis)<br>
29. Re: centos on ebox (Tru Huynh)<br>
30. Re: centos on ebox (Jerry Geis)<br>
31. Re: Re: centos on ebox (Tru Huynh)<br>
32. Re: Re: centos on ebox (Johnny Hughes)<br>
33. Re: FireFox (Scott Silva)<br>
34. Re: Low-memory Centos5? (MHR)<br>
35. Re: centos on ebox (Jerry Geis)<br>
36. Re: Re: centos on ebox (Johnny Hughes)<br>
37. Setting up a chroot (MHR)<br>
38. Frequent Gnome Terminal crashes in CentOS 5.1 (Alfred von Campe)<br>
39. Re: centos on ebox (Jerry Geis)<br>
40. Re: Frequent Gnome Terminal crashes in CentOS 5.1<br>
(Gregg McClintic)<br>
41. Re: Re: centos on ebox (Johnny Hughes)<br>
42. Re: Frequent Gnome Terminal crashes in CentOS 5.1 (Johnny Hughes)<br>
43. Re: centos on ebox (Jerry Geis)<br>
44. Re: Setting up a chroot (Johnny Hughes)<br>
45. RE: /etc/sysctl.conf edit not permanent (Joseph L. Casale)<br>
46. Re: 40 second delay on automounts with 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5<br>
kernel (Joe Pruett)<br>
47. Re: centos on ebox (Jerry Geis)<br>
48. Re: Frequent Gnome Terminal crashes in CentOS 5.1<br>
(Alfred von Campe)<br>
49. Re: centos on ebox (Scott Silva)<br>
50. Re: 40 second delay on automounts with 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5<br>
kernel (Ned Slider)<br>
51. Re: 40 second delay on automounts with 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5<br>
kernel (Scott Silva)<br>
52. Re: Re: 40 second delay on automounts with 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5<br>
kernel (Johnny Hughes)<br>
53. Re: Frequent Gnome Terminal crashes in CentOS 5.1 (MHR)<br>
54. Re: FireFox (William L. Maltby)<br>
55. Re: Centosplus vmware kernels....??? (Tom Bishop)<br>
56. Negative Values in delay pools (Sergio Belkin)<br>
57. Re: Frequent Gnome Terminal crashes in CentOS 5.1<br>
(Filipe Brandenburger)<br>
58. Re: Frequent Gnome Terminal crashes in CentOS 5.1<br>
(Filipe Brandenburger)<br>
59. Re: GFS (Jay Leafey)<br>
60. Re: Learning some sad things about the state of IPv6<br>
(Christopher Chan)<br>
61. Re: Learning some sad things about the state of IPv6<br>
(Matt Shields)<br>
62. Re: Learning some sad things about the state of IPv6 (Rob Townley)<br>
63. Re: Learning some sad things about the state of IPv6<br>
(Christopher Chan)<br>
64. Re: FireFox (Robert Spangler)<br>
65. Re: Config for NFSv4 an Kerberos on CentOS 5.1 (Sebastian Marten)<br>
66. offline file shares (gopinath)<br>
67. Re: offline file shares (John R Pierce)<br>
68. Re: offline file shares (Christopher Chan)<br>
69. Re: offline file shares (Fabian Arrotin - oxygen)<br>
70. Re: Centosplus vmware kernels....??? (Tru Huynh)<br>
71. Re: offline file shares (gopinath)<br>
72. Hasp Driver required (Balaji)<br>
73. Re: Hasp Driver required (Anne Wilson)<br>
74. Re: GFS (Karanbir Singh)<br>
75. Re: Learning some sad things about the state of IPv6<br>
(Karanbir Singh)<br>
76. Re: Frequent Gnome Terminal crashes in CentOS 5.1<br>
(Alfred von Campe)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:00:14 +0000 (UTC)<br>
From: <a href="mailto:centos-announce-request@centos.org">centos-announce-request@centos.org</a><br>
Subject: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 39, Issue 13<br>
To: <a href="mailto:centos-announce@centos.org">centos-announce@centos.org</a><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:20080529120014.8BC3EF3C973@mail.centos.org">20080529120014.8BC3EF3C973@mail.centos.org</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to<br>
<a href="mailto:centos-announce@centos.org">centos-announce@centos.org</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:centos-announce-request@centos.org">centos-announce-request@centos.org</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
<a href="mailto:centos-announce-owner@centos.org">centos-announce-owner@centos.org</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. CESA-2008:0288 Critical CentOS 3 i386 samba - security update<br>
(Tru Huynh)<br>
2. CESA-2008:0288 Critical CentOS 3 x86_64 samba - security<br>
update (Tru Huynh)<br>
3. CESA-2008:0288-01: Critical CentOS 2 i386 samba security<br>
update (John Newbigin)<br>
4. CESA-2008:0506-05: Low CentOS 2 i386 tzdata enhancement<br>
update (John Newbigin)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 22:10:34 +0200<br>
From: Tru Huynh <<a href="mailto:tru@centos.org">tru@centos.org</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0288 Critical CentOS 3 i386 samba<br>
- security update<br>
To: <a href="mailto:centos-announce@centos.org">centos-announce@centos.org</a><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:20080528201034.GA10630@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr">20080528201034.GA10630@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0288<br>
<br>
samba security update for CentOS 3 i386:<br>
<a href="https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0288.html" target="_blank">https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0288.html</a><br>
<br>
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to<br>
the mirrors:<br>
<br>
i386:<br>
updates/i386/RPMS/samba-3.0.9-1.3E.15.i386.rpm<br>
updates/i386/RPMS/samba-client-3.0.9-1.3E.15.i386.rpm<br>
updates/i386/RPMS/samba-common-3.0.9-1.3E.15.i386.rpm<br>
updates/i386/RPMS/samba-swat-3.0.9-1.3E.15.i386.rpm<br>
<br>
source:<br>
updates/SRPMS/samba-3.0.9-1.3E.15.src.rpm<br>
<br>
You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command:<br>
<br>
yum update samba\*<br>
<br>
Tru<br>
--<br>
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)<br>
<a href="http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B" target="_blank">http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B</a><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: not available<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 189 bytes<br>
Desc: not available<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080528/1e3cf1bb/attachment-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080528/1e3cf1bb/attachment-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 22:11:16 +0200<br>
From: Tru Huynh <<a href="mailto:tru@centos.org">tru@centos.org</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0288 Critical CentOS 3 x86_64<br>
samba - security update<br>
To: <a href="mailto:centos-announce@centos.org">centos-announce@centos.org</a><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:20080528201116.GB10630@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr">20080528201116.GB10630@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0288<br>
<br>
samba security update for CentOS 3 x86_64:<br>
<a href="https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0288.html" target="_blank">https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0288.html</a><br>
<br>
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to<br>
the mirrors:<br>
<br>
x86_64:<br>
updates/x86_64/RPMS/samba-3.0.9-1.3E.15.i386.rpm<br>
updates/x86_64/RPMS/samba-3.0.9-1.3E.15.x86_64.rpm<br>
updates/x86_64/RPMS/samba-client-3.0.9-1.3E.15.x86_64.rpm<br>
updates/x86_64/RPMS/samba-common-3.0.9-1.3E.15.i386.rpm<br>
updates/x86_64/RPMS/samba-common-3.0.9-1.3E.15.x86_64.rpm<br>
updates/x86_64/RPMS/samba-swat-3.0.9-1.3E.15.x86_64.rpm<br>
<br>
source:<br>
updates/SRPMS/samba-3.0.9-1.3E.15.src.rpm<br>
<br>
You may update your CentOS-3 x86_64 installations by running the command:<br>
<br>
yum update samba\*<br>
<br>
Tru<br>
--<br>
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)<br>
<a href="http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B" target="_blank">http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B</a><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: not available<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 189 bytes<br>
Desc: not available<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080528/2eb98105/attachment-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080528/2eb98105/attachment-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 3<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 09:35:27 +1000<br>
From: John Newbigin <<a href="mailto:jnewbigin@ict.swin.edu.au">jnewbigin@ict.swin.edu.au</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0288-01: Critical CentOS 2 i386<br>
samba security update<br>
To: <a href="mailto:centos-announce@centos.org">centos-announce@centos.org</a><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483DEC3F.4080100@ict.swin.edu.au">483DEC3F.4080100@ict.swin.edu.au</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>
<br>
The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded to the<br>
centos mirror:<br>
<br>
RHSA-2008:0288-01 Critical: samba security update<br>
<br>
Files available:<br>
samba-2.2.12-1.21as.9.3.i386.rpm<br>
samba-client-2.2.12-1.21as.9.3.i386.rpm<br>
samba-common-2.2.12-1.21as.9.3.i386.rpm<br>
samba-swat-2.2.12-1.21as.9.3.i386.rpm<br>
<br>
More details are available from the RedHat web site at<br>
<a href="https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html" target="_blank">https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html</a><br>
<br>
The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches<br>
is to run:<br>
# yum update<br>
<br>
--<br>
John Newbigin<br>
ITS Senior Analyst / Programmer<br>
Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies<br>
Swinburne University of Technology<br>
Melbourne, Australia<br>
<a href="http://www.ict.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin" target="_blank">http://www.ict.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 4<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 09:55:51 +1000<br>
From: John Newbigin <<a href="mailto:jnewbigin@ict.swin.edu.au">jnewbigin@ict.swin.edu.au</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0506-05: Low CentOS 2 i386 tzdata<br>
enhancement update<br>
To: <a href="mailto:centos-announce@centos.org">centos-announce@centos.org</a><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483DF107.202@ict.swin.edu.au">483DF107.202@ict.swin.edu.au</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>
<br>
The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded to the<br>
centos mirror:<br>
<br>
RHEA-2008:0506-05 tzdata enhancement update<br>
<br>
Files available:<br>
tzdata-2008b-3.el2_1.noarch.rpm<br>
<br>
More details are available from the RedHat web site at<br>
<a href="https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html" target="_blank">https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html</a><br>
<br>
The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches<br>
is to run:<br>
# yum update<br>
<br>
--<br>
John Newbigin<br>
ITS Senior Analyst / Programmer<br>
Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies<br>
Swinburne University of Technology<br>
Melbourne, Australia<br>
<a href="http://www.ict.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin" target="_blank">http://www.ict.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CentOS-announce mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CentOS-announce@centos.org">CentOS-announce@centos.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce</a><br>
<br>
<br>
End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 39, Issue 13<br>
***********************************************<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 13:14:24 +0100<br>
From: Anne Wilson <<a href="mailto:cannewilson@googlemail.com">cannewilson@googlemail.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Low-memory Centos5?<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:200805291314.30954.cannewilson@googlemail.com">200805291314.30954.cannewilson@googlemail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
On Thursday 29 May 2008 12:31:17 Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:<br>
> Good morning,<br>
><br>
> I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to<br>
> use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12" screen). The<br>
> bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.<br>
> Has anyone played with using Centos5 on systems with<br>
> little memory? Ideally, I don't need too much - Firefox,<br>
> Openoffice, a little Perl/Python/C here and there. I was<br>
> thinking about using either XFCE or Icewm as the window<br>
> manager. I'd also like it to work with the existing wireless<br>
> card (Dlink DWL-G650). Any thoughts or recommendations?<br>
><br>
For a time I ran FC6 on a laptop with only 256MB RAM, and I ran kde! It was<br>
slow, yes, but quite usable as long as I did one thing at a time.<br>
Considering the similarity between FC6 and CentOS5 I would think you'd be OK,<br>
using it with care. ISTR that Firefox occasionally caused runaway cpu, but I<br>
doubt if the same problem exists in the current CentOS version.<br>
<br>
Anne<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: not available<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 189 bytes<br>
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/851e0adf/attachment-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/851e0adf/attachment-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 3<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 14:22:15 +0200<br>
From: Wojtek Pilorz <wpilorz@bdk.pl><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Low-memory Centos5?<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <20080529122215.GB28817@bdk.pl><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii<br>
<br>
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 07:31:17AM -0400, Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:<br>
> Good morning,<br>
><br>
> I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to<br>
> use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12" screen). The<br>
> bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.<br>
> Has anyone played with using Centos5 on systems with<br>
> little memory? Ideally, I don't need too much - Firefox,<br>
I was running FedoraCore6 (very close to CentOS5)<br>
on a P4 box with 256MB of RAM, using KDE.<br>
<br>
OpenOffice (word, calc) was usable once it started, startup<br>
was rather slow.<br>
yum update was painful, I had to run it from text mode sometimes.<br>
With 384MB and IceWM or XFCE you should be OK<br>
(although I am not sure if Firefox and OpenOffice at the same<br>
time will be possible ...)<br>
One problem with old firefox is that it is (said to be) leaking memory<br>
so restarting it every few hours of so might be useful.<br>
I seem to remember that opera was advertised as being<br>
less memory hungry than firefox.<br>
<br>
> Openoffice, a little Perl/Python/C here and there. I was<br>
No eclipse, of course.<br>
<br>
> thinking about using either XFCE or Icewm as the window<br>
> manager. I'd also like it to work with the existing wireless<br>
> card (Dlink DWL-G650). Any thoughts or recommendations?<br>
No idea here.<br>
><br>
<br>
Good luck,<br>
<br>
Wojtek<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 4<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 08:25:27 -0400<br>
From: Max Hetrick <<a href="mailto:maxhetrick@verizon.net">maxhetrick@verizon.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Low-memory Centos5?<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483EA0B7.3070800@verizon.net">483EA0B7.3070800@verizon.net</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br>
<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA1<br>
<br>
Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:<br>
<br>
> I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to<br>
> use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12" screen). The<br>
> bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.<br>
> Has anyone played with using Centos5 on systems with<br>
> little memory? Ideally, I don't need too much - Firefox,<br>
> Openoffice, a little Perl/Python/C here and there. I was<br>
> thinking about using either XFCE or Icewm as the window<br>
> manager. I'd also like it to work with the existing wireless<br>
> card (Dlink DWL-G650). Any thoughts or recommendations?<br>
<br>
<br>
If you don't have to have a Red Hat based distro for this installation,<br>
perhaps look at DSL.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/" target="_blank">http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/</a><br>
<br>
You can do an installation to hard drive and it takes very little<br>
resources. It's Debian based, not my preference, but perfect for these<br>
types of situations.<br>
<br>
It's supposed to run on memory as low as 128Mb and still be fast.<br>
<br>
As far as your wireless, from what I read you have to use the<br>
ndiswrapper to get cards to work under it, configuring it with<br>
wlanconfig. I've never done it.<br>
<br>
Anyways, hope this helps. Not that I like suggesting non CentOS<br>
products, but it's a suggestion.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Max<br>
<br>
<br>
- --<br>
# find . "*imbecile" -exec sed -ie "s/stupidity/commonsense/g" '{}' \;<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)<br>
<br>
iD8DBQFIPqC3IXSX/6LmsXkRAvKHAKCG/j/xu+CLGw2Yrttki3zEKZgfMACfauEA<br>
7DexMfRU0Wf7dE/KVeZGcjk=<br>
=MbcR<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 5<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 18:05:08 +0530<br>
From: "whoami i" <<a href="mailto:hicheerup@gmail.com">hicheerup@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS] RE-export nfs mounted share<br>
To: <a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:29e045b80805290535o7893b939ye1e15fd4a8b6e7af@mail.gmail.com">29e045b80805290535o7893b939ye1e15fd4a8b6e7af@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Hi<br>
<br>
Is there any way to re-export an nfs mounted directory? I am having three<br>
servers runnning on centos4.5 and i am trying to implement nfs share in an<br>
below manner [bcoz there is no alternative way for me to setup nfs share]<br>
<br>
HOST A--->>>EXPORTS /prod/data ------->>>HOST B<br>
<br>
HOST B ---->>MOUNTED ------>>> /prod/data-----UNDER---/PROD1 [working fine]<br>
<br>
HOST B EXPORTS /PROD1 ------>>>>HOST C<br>
<br>
HOST C ----->>TRY MOUNTING ----->>>RESULT IN BELOW ERROR<br>
<br>
BUT WHEN I TRY TO MOUNT THE ALREADY MOUNTED NFS SHARE IN "HOST C " I AM<br>
GETTING BELOW ERROR.<br>
<br>
#################MOUNT ERROR##########################################<br>
mount: 10.65.64.30:/PROD1 failed, reason given by server: Permission denied<br>
##########################################################################<br>
<br>
Can anyone suggest me the way to work out aboVE scenario.<br>
<br>
<br>
Note: I find no -r(-re-export) option in rpc.mountd<br>
<br>
<br>
REGARDS<br>
LINGU<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/20e1daf9/attachment-0001.htm" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/20e1daf9/attachment-0001.htm</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 6<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 13:36:59 +0100<br>
From: Anne Wilson <<a href="mailto:cannewilson@googlemail.com">cannewilson@googlemail.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Low-memory Centos5?<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:200805291336.59926.cannewilson@googlemail.com">200805291336.59926.cannewilson@googlemail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
On Thursday 29 May 2008 13:22:15 Wojtek Pilorz wrote:<br>
> I'd also like it to work with the existing wireless<br>
><br>
> > card (Dlink DWL-G650). Any thoughts or recommendations?<br>
><br>
> No idea here.<br>
<br>
I'm fairly sure I've seen a how-to for that, so it's worth googling. I may<br>
have a printout with a url, but I can't look just now.<br>
<br>
Anne<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: not available<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 189 bytes<br>
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/6c93cca7/attachment-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/6c93cca7/attachment-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 7<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 08:46:38 -0400<br>
From: Robert Moskowitz <<a href="mailto:rgm@htt-consult.com">rgm@htt-consult.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Low-memory Centos5?<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483EA5AE.7030708@htt-consult.com">483EA5AE.7030708@htt-consult.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"<br>
<br>
Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:<br>
> Good morning,<br>
><br>
> I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to<br>
> use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12" screen). The<br>
> bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.<br>
> Has anyone played with using Centos5 on systems with<br>
> little memory? Ideally, I don't need too much - Firefox,<br>
> Openoffice, a little Perl/Python/C here and there. I was<br>
> thinking about using either XFCE or Icewm as the window<br>
> manager. I'd also like it to work with the existing wireless<br>
> card (Dlink DWL-G650). Any thoughts or recommendations?<br>
I have a number of 256Mb Centos installs here with Gnome. I shut off as<br>
many services as possible, and it runs. I made the swap partition (Yes I<br>
manually create a separate swap partition instead of running it in LVM)<br>
at least 512Mb if not more.<br>
<br>
Firefox 1.5 works fine. Watch yourself with OpenOffice, don't have too<br>
much running.<br>
<br>
One trick I do with Centos servers running with only 256Mb, is run<br>
VNCserver and then from my notebook access with Gnome. This works great,<br>
only a one line change in the vnc files to have Gnome as your GUI on the<br>
server.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 8<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 09:03:36 -0400<br>
From: "John" <<a href="mailto:jses27@gmail.com">jses27@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: RE: [CentOS] PPPoE client help<br>
To: "'CentOS mailing list'" <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <009d01c8c18c$6a5e3440$0700a8c0@ethan27><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href="mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org">centos-bounces@centos.org</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org">centos-bounces@centos.org</a>] On Behalf<br>
Of Robert Moskowitz<br>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 4:42 PM<br>
To: CentOS mailing list<br>
Subject: [CentOS] PPPoE client help<br>
<br>
Please point me in the right direction....<br>
<br>
My ISP is giving me an IPv6 prefix, but to get that I have to:<br>
<br>
The current Speedstream ADSL router will be configured as a bridge. I will<br>
have to set up a Linux (read Centos, I hope) router that will connect<br>
ethernet to the Speedstream but run PPPoE to his network and get both the<br>
IPv4 and IPv6 route delegations.<br>
<br>
There is no easy way that I know of to test this ahead of time. I basically<br>
have to get the box configed, have my ISP switch the Speedstream to briding<br>
mode, and GO! So I need to do some reading....<br>
---------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Try <a href="http://www.ipv6.org/howtos.html" target="_blank">http://www.ipv6.org/howtos.html</a> .<br>
<br>
JohnStanley<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CentOS mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CentOS@centos.org">CentOS@centos.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 9<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 08:11:23 -0500<br>
From: Johnny Hughes <<a href="mailto:johnny@centos.org">johnny@centos.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 centosplus?<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483EAB7B.5050407@centos.org">483EAB7B.5050407@centos.org</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Alfred von Campe wrote:<br>
> On May 28, 2008, at 14:08, Johnny Hughes wrote:<br>
><br>
>> We are currently using the builders to build centos-5.2 ... I can try<br>
>> to get the that kernel in, but we should very soon thereafter have<br>
>> the 5.2 one, so it might be better for you just to wait.<br>
><br>
> Does the 5.2 kernel include the NFS patch (RH bug 321111 I think)? The<br>
> only reason I am using the centosplus kernel is because of the NFS<br>
> performance issue. Oh, and I also like to have framebuffer support in<br>
> the kernel which was missing from the previous centosplus kernel. So if<br>
> the 5.2 kernel includes the NFS patch, and has FB support, that would<br>
> make my day!<br>
<br>
yes ... the new kernel is fixed upstream for that issue<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: signature.asc<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 252 bytes<br>
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/c07bac5b/signature-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/c07bac5b/signature-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 10<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 14:12:38 +0100<br>
From: Ned Slider <<a href="mailto:ned@unixmail.co.uk">ned@unixmail.co.uk</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Low-memory Centos5?<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483EABC6.4030505@unixmail.co.uk">483EABC6.4030505@unixmail.co.uk</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>
<br>
Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:<br>
> Good morning,<br>
><br>
> I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to<br>
> use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12" screen). The<br>
> bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.<br>
> Has anyone played with using Centos5 on systems with<br>
> little memory? Ideally, I don't need too much - Firefox,<br>
> Openoffice, a little Perl/Python/C here and there. I was<br>
> thinking about using either XFCE or Icewm as the window<br>
> manager. I'd also like it to work with the existing wireless<br>
> card (Dlink DWL-G650). Any thoughts or recommendations?<br>
><br>
> TIA!<br>
><br>
> Jeff<br>
><br>
<br>
As others have said, you should be fine with 384MB RAM. One thing to<br>
note - I think the graphical installer requires 512MB to run (check the<br>
release notes) so you would need to perform a text mode install. Do a<br>
fairly minimal install and add whatever you want afterwards with YUM.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 11<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 08:22:22 -0500<br>
From: Johnny Hughes <<a href="mailto:johnny@centos.org">johnny@centos.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40 second delay on automounts with<br>
2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 kernel<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483EAE0E.8050805@centos.org">483EAE0E.8050805@centos.org</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Joe Pruett wrote:<br>
> On Tue, 27 May 2008, Joe Pruett wrote:<br>
><br>
>> so, has anyone seen ipsec get messed up with the latest kernel?<br>
><br>
> i have verified that dropping back to the 53.1.19 kernel makes ipsec<br>
> function again. with the new 5.2 kernel coming soon, i'm not sure if it<br>
> makes sense to try and figure this out or not.<br>
<br>
This is already solved on another thread ... but for closure on this<br>
one, there is a known bug here with that kernel and ipsec:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853" target="_blank">http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853</a><br>
<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: signature.asc<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 252 bytes<br>
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/ca1714a3/signature-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/ca1714a3/signature-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 12<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 15:34:09 +0200<br>
From: Sebastian Marten <<a href="mailto:sebi4711@gmail.com">sebi4711@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS] Config for NFSv4 an Kerberos on CentOS 5.1<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483EB0D1.3050506@gmail.com">483EB0D1.3050506@gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"<br>
<br>
Hi list,<br>
Is it possible to set up an NFSv4/Kerberos environment on CentOS 5.1?<br>
I set up Kerberos and NFS but get several erros<br>
<br>
"Warning: rpc.gssd appears not to be running.<br>
mount.nfs4: Permission denied"<br>
<br>
Is this an CentOS oder an config problem?<br>
<br>
Greetings<br>
Sebastian<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: signature.asc<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 542 bytes<br>
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/a8b3f622/signature-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/a8b3f622/signature-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 13<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 15:37:31 +0200<br>
From: Wojtek Pilorz <wpilorz@bdk.pl><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Low-memory Centos5?<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <20080529133731.GC28817@bdk.pl><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii<br>
<br>
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 02:12:38PM +0100, Ned Slider wrote:<br>
> Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:<br>
> >Good morning,<br>
> ><br>
> >I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to<br>
> >use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12" screen). The<br>
> >bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.<br>
> >Has anyone played with using Centos5 on systems with<br>
> >little memory? Ideally, I don't need too much - Firefox,<br>
[...]<br>
> >Jeff<br>
> ><br>
><br>
> As others have said, you should be fine with 384MB RAM. One thing to<br>
> note - I think the graphical installer requires 512MB to run (check the<br>
> release notes) so you would need to perform a text mode install. Do a<br>
> fairly minimal install and add whatever you want afterwards with YUM.<br>
If no additional repositories are selected during installation,<br>
384MB should be OK with graphical.<br>
If you want to be sure, run it over vnc<br>
(needs specifying vnc vncpassword=a_password when starting installer)<br>
(and keep in mind vnc is unencrypted protocol;<br>
<br>
Graphical installer tends to be more complete than text in later RedHat systems.<br>
<br>
<br>
BTW. I am using CentOS 4.6 with KDE on P4 with 128MB RAM.<br>
Perhaps not stellar performance, but quite usable.<br>
(And I do not run OpenOffice and firefox at the same time...)<br>
<br>
Good luck,<br>
<br>
Wojtek.<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 14<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 15:44:22 +0200<br>
From: Markus Hetzenecker <<a href="mailto:markus.hetzenecker@uibk.ac.at">markus.hetzenecker@uibk.ac.at</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS] openafs kernel module<br>
To: <a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:200805291544.22401.markus.hetzenecker@uibk.ac.at">200805291544.22401.markus.hetzenecker@uibk.ac.at</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
We start to use centos 5 for our workstation at our site (University Innsbruck)<br>
and we use openafs to hold the home directories. There would be a big advantage<br>
to have the openafs kernel module (and the additional rpms) in the centos<br>
extras (or addons) repository with an automatic compile for the available<br>
kernels.<br>
If you need any help to do this i would be happy to participate in any way.<br>
<br>
Cheers, Markus.<br>
<br>
---<br>
fork() off;<br>
LinuxBetreuung Uni Ibk, fon: +43 512 507 2369<br>
GnuPG key: <a href="http://www.uibk.ac.at/%7Ec102130/public_key.asc" target="_blank">http://www.uibk.ac.at/~c102130/public_key.asc</a><br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 15<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 15:51:05 +0200<br>
From: "Sorin@Gmail" <<a href="mailto:sorin.srbu@gmail.com">sorin.srbu@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: RE: [CentOS] Low-memory Centos5?<br>
To: "'CentOS mailing list'" <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <60744A85CEE74854BEDF6B8B55A1CD7A@orgfarm.uu.local><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Jeffrey B. Layton <> scribbled on Thursday, May 29, 2008 1:31 PM:<br>
<br>
I use CentOS 5.1 with 256M RAM (incl X, Gnome, Firefox etc and the proprietary<br>
Nvidia 3D gfx drivers. Yes I know it's overkill, but it's so much nicer and<br>
easier to move around stuff using a file manager instead of doing it on the<br>
CLI) in a web server scenario (single family site with lots of pics). Works<br>
very well and I haven't had any problems, except for that yum maxes out the<br>
CPU (Amd Duron/750) occasionally.<br>
<br>
This is a stationary computer, and an old one at that. Portables however have<br>
a history of being slower generally (especially older ones), so you might want<br>
to inform us on what other hw you have in yours.<br>
<br>
XFCE is nice, fast and slick. Good choice. You might want to shut down most<br>
daemons you don't have a need for.<br>
<br>
I've been running CentOS 5 on a P3/500 with 256M as well (It's a Best<br>
Okechobee). Works fine, but some hardware might need some tweaking. I run X,<br>
Gnome, Firefox and OpenOffice et all on this one. CentOS even found my obscure<br>
noname USB-to-Ethernet adapter too! This machine runs fine and I haven't run<br>
into anything strange or difficult to resolve. Life is good.<br>
<br>
HTH.<br>
<br>
<br>
> I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to<br>
> use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12" screen). The<br>
> bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.<br>
> Has anyone played with using Centos5 on systems with<br>
> little memory? Ideally, I don't need too much - Firefox,<br>
> Openoffice, a little Perl/Python/C here and there. I was<br>
> thinking about using either XFCE or Icewm as the window<br>
> manager. I'd also like it to work with the existing wireless<br>
> card (Dlink DWL-G650). Any thoughts or recommendations?<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: smime.p7s<br>
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature<br>
Size: 5118 bytes<br>
Desc: not available<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/91cea634/smime-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/91cea634/smime-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 16<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 09:04:10 -0500<br>
From: Johnny Hughes <<a href="mailto:johnny@centos.org">johnny@centos.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] openafs kernel module<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483EB7DA.3050008@centos.org">483EB7DA.3050008@centos.org</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Markus Hetzenecker wrote:<br>
> We start to use centos 5 for our workstation at our site (University Innsbruck)<br>
> and we use openafs to hold the home directories. There would be a big advantage<br>
> to have the openafs kernel module (and the additional rpms) in the centos<br>
> extras (or addons) repository with an automatic compile for the available<br>
> kernels.<br>
> If you need any help to do this i would be happy to participate in any way.<br>
><br>
<br>
openafs is available here:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://atrpms.net/dist/el5/openafs/" target="_blank">http://atrpms.net/dist/el5/openafs/</a><br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: signature.asc<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 252 bytes<br>
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/f73bfcc5/signature-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/f73bfcc5/signature-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 17<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 09:04:16 -0500<br>
From: Barry Brimer <<a href="mailto:lists@brimer.org">lists@brimer.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Config for NFSv4 an Kerberos on CentOS 5.1<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:1212069856.483eb7e05c0d3@mail.toucanhost.com">1212069856.483eb7e05c0d3@mail.toucanhost.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br>
<br>
Quoting Sebastian Marten <<a href="mailto:sebi4711@gmail.com">sebi4711@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
<br>
> Hi list,<br>
> Is it possible to set up an NFSv4/Kerberos environment on CentOS 5.1?<br>
> I set up Kerberos and NFS but get several erros<br>
><br>
> "Warning: rpc.gssd appears not to be running.<br>
> mount.nfs4: Permission denied"<br>
><br>
> Is this an CentOS oder an config problem?<br>
<br>
Yes.<br>
<br>
Are you running all of the gss services?<br>
Is portmap running?<br>
Did you uncomment the SECURE_NFS="yes" in /etc/sysconfig/nfs?<br>
Was your kerberos principal created with:<br>
"addprinc -randkey -e des-cbc-md5:normal nfs/<a href="http://server.domain.com" target="_blank">server.domain.com</a>"<br>
Was your keytab entry created with:<br>
"ktadd -e des-cbc-md5:normal nfs/<a href="http://server.domain.com" target="_blank">server.domain.com</a>"<br>
Do you have gss/krb5p just before the nfs options in parentheses?<br>
<br>
Hope this helps.<br>
<br>
Barry<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 18<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 09:06:34 -0500<br>
From: Barry Brimer <<a href="mailto:lists@brimer.org">lists@brimer.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] RE-export nfs mounted share<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:1212069994.483eb86aa5555@mail.toucanhost.com">1212069994.483eb86aa5555@mail.toucanhost.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br>
<br>
Quoting whoami i <<a href="mailto:hicheerup@gmail.com">hicheerup@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
<br>
> Hi<br>
><br>
> Is there any way to re-export an nfs mounted directory? I am having three<br>
> servers runnning on centos4.5 and i am trying to implement nfs share in an<br>
> below manner [bcoz there is no alternative way for me to setup nfs share]<br>
<br>
<br>
Did you add the options crossmnt,fsid=0 to the top level nfs export? The fsid=0<br>
might not be needed, but I'm pretty sure the crossmnt is needed.<br>
<br>
Barry<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 19<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 07:38:41 -0700<br>
From: Bob Taylor <<a href="mailto:bob8221@gmail.com">bob8221@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Low-memory Centos5?<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <1212071921.5483.17.camel@ann.qtpi.local><br>
Content-Type: text/plain<br>
<br>
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 14:12 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:<br>
> Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:<br>
> > Good morning,<br>
> ><br>
> > I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to<br>
> > use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12" screen). The<br>
> > bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.<br>
> > Has anyone played with using Centos5 on systems with<br>
> > little memory? Ideally, I don't need too much - Firefox,<br>
> > Openoffice, a little Perl/Python/C here and there. I was<br>
> > thinking about using either XFCE or Icewm as the window<br>
> > manager. I'd also like it to work with the existing wireless<br>
> > card (Dlink DWL-G650). Any thoughts or recommendations?<br>
<br>
><br>
> As others have said, you should be fine with 384MB RAM. One thing to<br>
> note - I think the graphical installer requires 512MB to run (check the<br>
> release notes) so you would need to perform a text mode install. Do a<br>
> fairly minimal install and add whatever you want afterwards with YUM.<br>
<br>
I have been running FC 3 and now CentOS 5.1 on an old Gateway 2000 with<br>
only 256MB RAM. Both installed with GUI. Only some editing of services.<br>
I have 1 Gig of swap. I currently have 1 instance of emacs, Evolution,<br>
CDDBSlave2, Firefox <a href="http://2.0.0.12" target="_blank">2.0.0.12</a> and 2 Gnome terminals plus a whole lot of<br>
services running most of which I *hope* I don't need. Screen refresh is<br>
slow but not too much. The machine starts to *really* slow down after<br>
about 15% swap. All I do is logout. Oh, this is my only computer. If<br>
anyone wants to tell me to buy a new one, please send me the money.<br>
Otherwise keep your silence. :-)<br>
<br>
Bob<br>
--<br>
Bob Taylor<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 20<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 10:40:00 -0400<br>
From: Jerry Geis <<a href="mailto:geisj@pagestation.com">geisj@pagestation.com</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS] servercd i386 5.1<br>
To: CentOS ML <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483EC040.3000205@pagestation.com">483EC040.3000205@pagestation.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>
<br>
I am looking for the servercd for i386 centos 5.1 on the mirrors.<br>
Not finding it though.<br>
<br>
Can someone point me to it. Thanks,<br>
<br>
Jerry<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 21<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 09:54:07 -0500<br>
From: Johnny Hughes <<a href="mailto:johnny@centos.org">johnny@centos.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 ?<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483EC38F.6050109@centos.org">483EC38F.6050109@centos.org</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:<br>
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:11 AM, MHR <<a href="mailto:mhullrich@gmail.com">mhullrich@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt <<a href="mailto:ra%2Bcentos@br-online.de">ra+centos@br-online.de</a>> wrote:<br>
>>> Answer: When it's ready.<br>
>> Suits me - I have a different question (and it's probably up somewhere<br>
>> I don't have time to look at the moment - I'll check when I get to<br>
>> work, but by then I'll have forgotten this question again).<br>
>><br>
>> Does 5.2 have an updated release of GDE with it?<br>
>><br>
>> Every so often, among other things, when I exit Evolution, it crashes,<br>
>> but Bug Buddy says it can't report the bug because my GDE is too old.<br>
>><br>
>> 5.0 came with GDE <a href="http://2.16.0." target="_blank">2.16.0.</a> Gnome development is up to 2.23.1 (or later<br>
>> - I lost track).<br>
>><br>
><br>
> RHEL-5 will probably be 2.16 til its end of life.<br>
<br>
This is generally true .. the minor kde or gnome version (that is the 5<br>
in kde-3.5.4 or the 16 in gnome-2.16.0) has never changed in a the same<br>
RHEL version in the past ...<br>
<br>
HOWEVER, I have heard that RHEL-6 is a ways off and that RHEL 5.3 will<br>
continue to have major changes, even more pronounced than those in 5.2,<br>
so we will need to wait and see :D<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: signature.asc<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 252 bytes<br>
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/add3b705/signature-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/add3b705/signature-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 22<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 11:10:57 -0400<br>
From: "Ross S. W. Walker" <<a href="mailto:rwalker@medallion.com">rwalker@medallion.com</a>><br>
Subject: RE: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 ?<br>
To: "CentOS mailing list" <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<E2BB8074E5500C42984D980D4BD78EF9022A7212@MFG-NYC-EXCH2.mfg.prv><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
Johnny Hughes wrote:<br>
<br>
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:<br>
> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:11 AM, MHR <<a href="mailto:mhullrich@gmail.com">mhullrich@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt <<a href="mailto:ra%2Bcentos@br-online.de">ra+centos@br-online.de</a>> wrote:<br>
> >>> Answer: When it's ready.<br>
> >> Suits me - I have a different question (and it's probably up somewhere<br>
> >> I don't have time to look at the moment - I'll check when I get to<br>
> >> work, but by then I'll have forgotten this question again).<br>
> >><br>
> >> Does 5.2 have an updated release of GDE with it?<br>
> >><br>
> >> Every so often, among other things, when I exit Evolution, it crashes,<br>
> >> but Bug Buddy says it can't report the bug because my GDE is too old.<br>
> >><br>
> >> 5.0 came with GDE <a href="http://2.16.0." target="_blank">2.16.0.</a> Gnome development is up to 2.23.1 (or later<br>
> >> - I lost track).<br>
> >><br>
> ><br>
> > RHEL-5 will probably be 2.16 til its end of life.<br>
><br>
> This is generally true .. the minor kde or gnome version (that is the 5<br>
> in kde-3.5.4 or the 16 in gnome-2.16.0) has never changed in a the same<br>
> RHEL version in the past ...<br>
><br>
> HOWEVER, I have heard that RHEL-6 is a ways off and that RHEL 5.3 will<br>
> continue to have major changes, even more pronounced than those in 5.2,<br>
> so we will need to wait and see :D<br>
<br>
Well one can hope... Personally I would love to see KDE 3.5.9<br>
pulled in as it is a lot more stable and robust then KDE <a href="http://3.5.4." target="_blank">3.5.4.</a><br>
<br>
KDE 4.0 is still way too immature even for RHEL 6, the interface<br>
still needs a lot of working out, polishing and the icons need to<br>
look more, well less like a child's software system.<br>
<br>
I still prefer to use KDE 3.5 and 3.5.9 is definitely the way to<br>
go there.<br>
<br>
-Ross<br>
<br>
______________________________________________________________________<br>
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by<br>
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged<br>
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient<br>
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,<br>
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,<br>
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,<br>
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the<br>
original and any copy or printout thereof.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 23<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 16:38:19 +0100<br>
From: Ned Slider <<a href="mailto:ned@unixmail.co.uk">ned@unixmail.co.uk</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] servercd i386 5.1<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483ECDEB.8040300@unixmail.co.uk">483ECDEB.8040300@unixmail.co.uk</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>
<br>
Jerry Geis wrote:<br>
> I am looking for the servercd for i386 centos 5.1 on the mirrors.<br>
> Not finding it though.<br>
><br>
> Can someone point me to it. Thanks,<br>
><br>
> Jerry<br>
<br>
<br>
There is currently no serverCD for CentOS 5.1, but you can install from<br>
just the first CD if that helps. See here:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS5#head-c79c201900d22f163a445f134fcc6c916eb3cb6e" target="_blank">http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS5#head-c79c201900d22f163a445f134fcc6c916eb3cb6e</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 24<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 11:46:53 -0400<br>
From: Jerry Geis <<a href="mailto:geisj@pagestation.com">geisj@pagestation.com</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS] centos on ebox<br>
Cc: CentOS ML <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483ECFED.4030000@pagestation.com">483ECFED.4030000@pagestation.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
><br>
> Jerry Geis wrote:<br>
> >/ I am looking for the servercd for i386 centos 5.1 on the mirrors.<br>
> />/ Not finding it though.<br>
> />/<br>
> />/ Can someone point me to it. Thanks,<br>
> />/<br>
> />/ Jerry<br>
> /<br>
><br>
> There is currently no serverCD for CentOS 5.1, but you can install from<br>
> just the first CD if that helps. See here:<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS5#head-c79c201900d22f163a445f134fcc6c916eb3cb6e" target="_blank">http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS5#head-c79c201900d22f163a445f134fcc6c916eb3cb6e</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
I grabbed the first CD and tried booting. no luck at this point.<br>
<br>
I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.<br>
This unit has a vortex86 CPU.<br>
When installing the unit finds the USB cdrom I type "linux text" and it<br>
starts<br>
vlinuz...<br>
init....<br>
Screen goes black and the unit reboots.<br>
<br>
I also tried with acpi=off.<br>
<br>
Any ideas on getting anaconda to come up on this ebox unit?<br>
<br>
Jerry<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/4a27799f/attachment-0001.htm" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/4a27799f/attachment-0001.htm</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 25<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 16:49:56 +0100<br>
From: Ned Slider <<a href="mailto:ned@unixmail.co.uk">ned@unixmail.co.uk</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 ?<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483ED0A4.20208@unixmail.co.uk">483ED0A4.20208@unixmail.co.uk</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>
<br>
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:<br>
> Johnny Hughes wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:<br>
>>> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:11 AM, MHR <<a href="mailto:mhullrich@gmail.com">mhullrich@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt <<a href="mailto:ra%2Bcentos@br-online.de">ra+centos@br-online.de</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>>> Answer: When it's ready.<br>
>>>> Suits me - I have a different question (and it's probably up somewhere<br>
>>>> I don't have time to look at the moment - I'll check when I get to<br>
>>>> work, but by then I'll have forgotten this question again).<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Does 5.2 have an updated release of GDE with it?<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Every so often, among other things, when I exit Evolution, it crashes,<br>
>>>> but Bug Buddy says it can't report the bug because my GDE is too old.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> 5.0 came with GDE <a href="http://2.16.0." target="_blank">2.16.0.</a> Gnome development is up to 2.23.1 (or later<br>
>>>> - I lost track).<br>
>>>><br>
>>> RHEL-5 will probably be 2.16 til its end of life.<br>
>> This is generally true .. the minor kde or gnome version (that is the 5<br>
>> in kde-3.5.4 or the 16 in gnome-2.16.0) has never changed in a the same<br>
>> RHEL version in the past ...<br>
>><br>
>> HOWEVER, I have heard that RHEL-6 is a ways off and that RHEL 5.3 will<br>
>> continue to have major changes, even more pronounced than those in 5.2,<br>
>> so we will need to wait and see :D<br>
><br>
> Well one can hope... Personally I would love to see KDE 3.5.9<br>
> pulled in as it is a lot more stable and robust then KDE <a href="http://3.5.4." target="_blank">3.5.4.</a><br>
><br>
> KDE 4.0 is still way too immature even for RHEL 6, the interface<br>
> still needs a lot of working out, polishing and the icons need to<br>
> look more, well less like a child's software system.<br>
><br>
> I still prefer to use KDE 3.5 and 3.5.9 is definitely the way to<br>
> go there.<br>
><br>
> -Ross<br>
><br>
<br>
Well hopefully the testing of KDE 4 in Fedora 9 will answer the issue of<br>
whether it is ready or not for RHEL6. Also, as RHEL6 is still a way off,<br>
and KDE 4 is developing fast, things _may_ have changed by the time it<br>
is released. But I do agree, atm I'd personally rather see KDE 3.5 included.<br>
<br>
The other factor to consider is the long term support issues related to<br>
maintaining KDE 3.5 in RHEL6 given that I _think_ qt3 is already<br>
unsupported.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 26<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 18:03:24 +0200<br>
From: Ralph Angenendt <<a href="mailto:ra%2Bcentos@br-online.de">ra+centos@br-online.de</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] centos on ebox<br>
To: <a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:20080529160324.GC7728@br-online.de">20080529160324.GC7728@br-online.de</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
Jerry Geis wrote:<br>
<br>
> I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.<br>
> This unit has a vortex86 CPU.<br>
> When installing the unit finds the USB cdrom I type "linux text" and it<br>
> starts<br>
> vlinuz...<br>
> init....<br>
> Screen goes black and the unit reboots.<br>
<br>
Sounds like an i586 CPU which is not supported by CentOS 5. You'd<br>
probably have better luck with CentOS 4.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Ralph<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: not available<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 194 bytes<br>
Desc: not available<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/7c737650/attachment-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/7c737650/attachment-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 27<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:11:01 -0400<br>
From: David Halik <<a href="mailto:dhalik@jla.rutgers.edu">dhalik@jla.rutgers.edu</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS] nfsnobody 65534 vs 4294967294<br>
To: <a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483ED595.3000301@jla.rutgers.edu">483ED595.3000301@jla.rutgers.edu</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>
<br>
<br>
Hi, I just had a couple of questions about nfsnobody.<br>
<br>
We run a very large NFS infrastructure based off of a NetApp, and we're<br>
been discussing whether or not it is necessary to have 64 bit nfsnobody<br>
as 4294967294. I understand the reasoning behind this (2^32 - 2 gives<br>
you a max UID), but we're having issues since we run multiple<br>
architectures. The UID doesn't play nice across Solairs, Centos, 32 vs<br>
64bit, etc.<br>
<br>
Are there any obvious security risks or problems with using nfsnobody as<br>
65534 (2^16 - 2) on 64bit, or even just assigning it a random value, 300<br>
for example? I can't see any particular reason for having such a high<br>
number other than to keep it above any possible real UID space.<br>
<br>
Also, the NetApp automatically generates quota tables based off of the<br>
highest UID, so obviously this is a *major* problem if suddenly we have<br>
billions of users as far as the NetApp is concerned. Ultimately, we'd<br>
like to just assign it a low value in the range with our other system<br>
account, but we are not sure of the potential risks with NFS etc.<br>
<br>
Any comments would be appreciated.<br>
Thanks!<br>
<br>
--<br>
================================<br>
David Halik<br>
System Administrator<br>
OIT-CSS Rutgers University<br>
<a href="mailto:dhalik@jla.rutgers.edu">dhalik@jla.rutgers.edu</a><br>
================================<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 28<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:24:08 -0400<br>
From: Jerry Geis <<a href="mailto:geisj@pagestation.com">geisj@pagestation.com</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS] Re: centos on ebox<br>
To: CentOS ML <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483ED8A8.4040804@pagestation.com">483ED8A8.4040804@pagestation.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
><br>
> Jerry Geis wrote:<br>
><br>
> >/ I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.<br>
> />/ This unit has a vortex86 CPU.<br>
> />/ When installing the unit finds the USB cdrom I type "linux text" and it<br>
> />/ starts<br>
> />/ vlinuz...<br>
> />/ init....<br>
> />/ Screen goes black and the unit reboots.<br>
> /<br>
> Sounds like an i586 CPU which is not supported by CentOS 5. You'd<br>
> probably have better luck with CentOS 4.<br>
><br>
> Cheers,<br>
><br>
> Ralph<br>
><br>
Ralph,<br>
<br>
I thought if it is a 586 CPU it should run 386 code right?<br>
So I didnt think there should be an issue there...<br>
<br>
I can see not being able to run 586 code on a 386 but the other way<br>
around should be ok.<br>
<br>
Jerry<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/8f78c97e/attachment-0001.htm" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/8f78c97e/attachment-0001.htm</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 29<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 18:24:36 +0200<br>
From: Tru Huynh <<a href="mailto:tru@centos.org">tru@centos.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] centos on ebox<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:20080529162436.GE28463@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr">20080529162436.GE28463@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:<br>
><br>
> I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.<br>
<a href="http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx</a> ?<br>
<br>
you won't make it with only 128 MB of RAM...<br>
is the cpu i686 compatible?<br>
<br>
Tru<br>
<br>
--<br>
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)<br>
<a href="http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B" target="_blank">http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B</a><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: not available<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 189 bytes<br>
Desc: not available<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/f1fa592b/attachment-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/f1fa592b/attachment-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 30<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:38:38 -0400<br>
From: Jerry Geis <<a href="mailto:geisj@pagestation.com">geisj@pagestation.com</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS] Re: centos on ebox<br>
To: CentOS ML <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483EDC0E.80002@pagestation.com">483EDC0E.80002@pagestation.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>
<br>
><br>
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:<br>
> >/<br>
> />/ I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.<br>
> /<a href="http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx</a> ?<br>
><br>
> you won't make it with only 128 MB of RAM...<br>
> is the cpu i686 compatible?<br>
><br>
> Tru<br>
><br>
Tru,<br>
<br>
yes this is the box I am trying to install on...<br>
<br>
I dont know if its i686, either way I thought i386 should work. I am I<br>
wrong?<br>
<br>
Is it the 128M memory issue? I thought I used to install with that much<br>
- especially in text mode.<br>
<br>
Any suggestions.<br>
<br>
Jerry<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 31<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 19:11:35 +0200<br>
From: Tru Huynh <<a href="mailto:tru@centos.org">tru@centos.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: centos on ebox<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:20080529171135.GA15177@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr">20080529171135.GA15177@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:38:38PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:<br>
...<br>
><br>
> yes this is the box I am trying to install on...<br>
><br>
> I dont know if its i686, either way I thought i386 should work. I am I<br>
> wrong?<br>
yes, the i686 has some additionnal instructions that a i586 does not<br>
have. I have no idea about the cpu listed there.<br>
<br>
Try C4 with the i586 or i686 (default) version. You will be fixed.<br>
C5 does not support i586 class cpu. There was a thread about it<br>
some days/weeks ago. Not much volonteer to do/support it and the<br>
CentOS team has other priorities ;).<br>
<br>
> Is it the 128M memory issue? I thought I used to install with that much<br>
> - especially in text mode.<br>
it's below the minimal recommended size (256MB). It may work, I haven't tried.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Tru<br>
--<br>
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)<br>
<a href="http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B" target="_blank">http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B</a><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: not available<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 189 bytes<br>
Desc: not available<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/979e2f38/attachment-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/979e2f38/attachment-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 32<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:14:24 -0500<br>
From: Johnny Hughes <<a href="mailto:johnny@centos.org">johnny@centos.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: centos on ebox<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483EE470.1040107@centos.org">483EE470.1040107@centos.org</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Jerry Geis wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:<br>
>> >/ />/ I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.<br>
>> /<a href="http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx</a> ?<br>
>><br>
>> you won't make it with only 128 MB of RAM...<br>
>> is the cpu i686 compatible?<br>
><br>
<br>
> yes this is the box I am trying to install on...<br>
><br>
> I dont know if its i686, either way I thought i386 should work. I am I<br>
> wrong?<br>
<br>
None of the RHEL branches support any processors that are < i686 for the<br>
i386 arch.<br>
<br>
CentOS supports i586 in centOS-3 and CentOS-4 (things not in RHEL) ..<br>
and only i686 in CentOS-2 and CentOS-5 (just like RHEL).<br>
<br>
So, NO ... and i586 processor will not run CentOS-5.<br>
><br>
> Is it the 128M memory issue? I thought I used to install with that much<br>
> - especially in text mode.<br>
><br>
> Any suggestions.<br>
<br>
doing some research ... this is a pentium mmx compatible chip, which is<br>
i586 ... you can use CentOS-4 on there.<br>
<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: signature.asc<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 252 bytes<br>
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/86d63054/signature-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/86d63054/signature-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 33<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 10:22:11 -0700<br>
From: Scott Silva <<a href="mailto:ssilva@sgvwater.com">ssilva@sgvwater.com</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS] Re: FireFox<br>
To: <a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a><br>
Message-ID: <g1moo3$f6i$<a href="mailto:5@ger.gmane.org">5@ger.gmane.org</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
on 5-29-2008 4:55 AM Daniel de Kok spake the following:<br>
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <<a href="mailto:smooge-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org">smooge-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>> It will depend upon if Red Hat will release a version for Red Hat<br>
>> Enterprise Linux. The best bet will be that they will not release it<br>
>> until RHEL-4.7 goes into beta testing.<br>
><br>
> It looks like there is a good chance it will be included in 4.7:<br>
> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2008-May/msg00052.html" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2008-May/msg00052.html</a><br>
><br>
> (- Added Firefox3)<br>
><br>
> Take care,<br>
> Daniel<br>
RedHat must be trying to cut some of the costs of backporting. They seem<br>
somewhat more willing to update versions then they used to be.<br>
<br>
--<br>
MailScanner is like deodorant...<br>
You hope everybody uses it, and<br>
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: signature.asc<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 258 bytes<br>
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/02cea4a7/signature-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/02cea4a7/signature-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 34<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 11:00:22 -0700<br>
From: MHR <<a href="mailto:mhullrich@gmail.com">mhullrich@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Low-memory Centos5?<br>
To: "CentOS mailing list" <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:f4e013870805291100u2015d817gca6995deca3a9f3d@mail.gmail.com">f4e013870805291100u2015d817gca6995deca3a9f3d@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br>
<br>
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Jeffrey B. Layton <<a href="mailto:laytonjb@charter.net">laytonjb@charter.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> Good morning,<br>
><br>
> I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to<br>
> use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12" screen). The<br>
> bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.<br>
> Has anyone played with using Centos5 on systems with<br>
> little memory? Ideally, I don't need too much - Firefox,<br>
> Openoffice, a little Perl/Python/C here and there. I was<br>
> thinking about using either XFCE or Icewm as the window<br>
> manager. I'd also like it to work with the existing wireless<br>
> card (Dlink DWL-G650). Any thoughts or recommendations?<br>
><br>
<br>
I have an old Toshiba Tecra laptop with a P3 running 600MHz and 256MB<br>
of memory. I installed CentOS 5.1 with the graphical installer, and<br>
it runs GNOME fairly well. It's slow (compared to my main desktop,<br>
but that's an AMD 64x2 4200+ with 4GB of memory), but I expect that<br>
with an older, slower CPU like this (as opposed to a molasses crawl<br>
/old/ CPU :-). I use OOo 2.4 on it, and that is also slow, but it<br>
runs, and I always use the command line interface whenever I can, but<br>
that's 'cuz I'm more comfortable there, and it works nicely all<br>
around.<br>
<br>
YMMV<br>
<br>
mhr<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 35<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 14:01:31 -0400<br>
From: Jerry Geis <<a href="mailto:geisj@pagestation.com">geisj@pagestation.com</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS] Re: centos on ebox<br>
To: CentOS ML <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483EEF7B.8060103@pagestation.com">483EEF7B.8060103@pagestation.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>
<br>
><br>
> Jerry Geis wrote:<br>
> >>/<br>
> />>/ On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:<br>
> />>/ >/ />/ I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.<br>
> />>/ /<a href="http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx</a> ?<br>
> />>/<br>
> />>/ you won't make it with only 128 MB of RAM...<br>
> />>/ is the cpu i686 compatible?<br>
> />/<br>
> /<br>
> >/ yes this is the box I am trying to install on...<br>
> />/<br>
> />/ I dont know if its i686, either way I thought i386 should work. I am I<br>
> />/ wrong?<br>
> /<br>
> None of the RHEL branches support any processors that are < i686 for the<br>
> i386 arch.<br>
><br>
> CentOS supports i586 in centOS-3 and CentOS-4 (things not in RHEL) ..<br>
> and only i686 in CentOS-2 and CentOS-5 (just like RHEL).<br>
><br>
> So, NO ... and i586 processor will not run CentOS-5.<br>
> >/<br>
> />/ Is it the 128M memory issue? I thought I used to install with that much<br>
> />/ - especially in text mode.<br>
> />/<br>
> />/ Any suggestions.<br>
> /<br>
> doing some research ... this is a pentium mmx compatible chip, which is<br>
> i586 ... you can use CentOS-4 on there.<br>
><br>
I just tried my old centos 4.4 i386 disk 1<br>
did "linux text mem=128M" and the same thing.<br>
after vmlinuz.., and initrd... it just resets.<br>
<br>
Am I not boot with the correct options to get the 386 kernel and its<br>
trying to use the 686 kernel?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Jerry<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 36<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 13:08:50 -0500<br>
From: Johnny Hughes <<a href="mailto:johnny@centos.org">johnny@centos.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: centos on ebox<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483EF132.3080409@centos.org">483EF132.3080409@centos.org</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Jerry Geis wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Jerry Geis wrote:<br>
>> >>/<br>
>> />>/ On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:<br>
>> />>/ >/ />/ I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.<br>
>> />>/ /<a href="http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx</a> ?<br>
>> />>/<br>
>> />>/ you won't make it with only 128 MB of RAM...<br>
>> />>/ is the cpu i686 compatible?<br>
>> />/ /<br>
>> >/ yes this is the box I am trying to install on...<br>
>> />/ />/ I dont know if its i686, either way I thought i386 should<br>
>> work. I am I />/ wrong?<br>
>> /<br>
>> None of the RHEL branches support any processors that are < i686 for<br>
>> the i386 arch.<br>
>><br>
>> CentOS supports i586 in centOS-3 and CentOS-4 (things not in RHEL) ..<br>
>> and only i686 in CentOS-2 and CentOS-5 (just like RHEL).<br>
>><br>
>> So, NO ... and i586 processor will not run CentOS-5.<br>
>> >/ />/ Is it the 128M memory issue? I thought I used to install with<br>
>> that much />/ - especially in text mode.<br>
>> />/ />/ Any suggestions.<br>
>> /<br>
>> doing some research ... this is a pentium mmx compatible chip, which<br>
>> is i586 ... you can use CentOS-4 on there.<br>
>><br>
> I just tried my old centos 4.4 i386 disk 1<br>
> did "linux text mem=128M" and the same thing.<br>
> after vmlinuz.., and initrd... it just resets.<br>
><br>
> Am I not boot with the correct options to get the 386 kernel and its<br>
> trying to use the 686 kernel?<br>
><br>
<br>
now do:<br>
<br>
i586 text mem=128<br>
<br>
:D<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: signature.asc<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 252 bytes<br>
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/25f01f9c/signature-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/25f01f9c/signature-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 37<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 11:17:43 -0700<br>
From: MHR <<a href="mailto:mhullrich@gmail.com">mhullrich@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS] Setting up a chroot<br>
To: "CentOS mailing list" <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:f4e013870805291117gc3d098cocf6a4098195f05ea@mail.gmail.com">f4e013870805291117gc3d098cocf6a4098195f05ea@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br>
<br>
I'm trying to build GNOME (to run a more recent version than 2.16.* on<br>
CentOS 5.1) and I keep running into a lot of rather strange problems.<br>
<br>
I'm wondering if this might have something to do with my hybrid 64 and<br>
32 bit general environment, so I want to try a pure 64-bit chroot.<br>
<br>
I've never done this before, and I'm not entirely sure how to, and I<br>
didn't see anything particularly on point, either at <a href="http://centos.org" target="_blank">centos.org</a> or<br>
google. If I missed it, just say where and that should be enough.<br>
<br>
Guidelines? Suggestions (other than "go away" or other physically<br>
difficult crudities :-)?<br>
<br>
Thanks.<br>
<br>
mhr<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 38<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 14:23:24 -0400<br>
From: Alfred von Campe <<a href="mailto:alfred@von-campe.com">alfred@von-campe.com</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS] Frequent Gnome Terminal crashes in CentOS 5.1<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:D20517A9-FAD1-48A8-AE35-DB6D18497DAC@von-campe.com">D20517A9-FAD1-48A8-AE35-DB6D18497DAC@von-campe.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed<br>
<br>
Ever since I upgraded all my systems to CentOS 5.1 I have been<br>
getting reports from users about "all their windows disappearing". A<br>
little digging revealed that they meant all gnome-terminal windows.<br>
Since there is only one gnome-terminal process by default for all<br>
your open terminal windows and tabs, a crash of that process means<br>
losing all your terminal windows. These crashes often (but not<br>
always) occur over night when the system is otherwise idle.<br>
<br>
A quick Google search found a problem on Ubuntu related to VTE (the<br>
terminal emulator widget used by gnome-terminal) but not much else of<br>
interest. Has anyone on this list experienced this? I find it hard<br>
to believe I'm the only one. I never saw this issue while running<br>
CentOS 4.X on these systems...<br>
<br>
Alfred<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 39<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 14:30:05 -0400<br>
From: Jerry Geis <<a href="mailto:geisj@pagestation.com">geisj@pagestation.com</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS] Re: centos on ebox<br>
To: CentOS ML <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483EF62D.2060907@pagestation.com">483EF62D.2060907@pagestation.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>
<br>
><br>
> now do:<br>
><br>
> i586 text mem=128<br>
><br>
><br>
when I do "i586 text mem=128" it says cant find kernel<br>
so I do "linux i586 text mem=128" and I get the same behavior<br>
Loading vmlinuz....<br>
Loading initrd....<br>
and reboot.<br>
<br>
Am I not correctly specifying the kernel yet?<br>
<br>
Jerry<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 40<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 14:40:56 -0400<br>
From: Gregg McClintic <<a href="mailto:gregg@thegbox.com">gregg@thegbox.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Frequent Gnome Terminal crashes in CentOS 5.1<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:1212086456.5154.3.camel@doubleg.liquidweb.com">1212086456.5154.3.camel@doubleg.liquidweb.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain<br>
<br>
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 14:23 -0400, Alfred von Campe wrote:<br>
> Ever since I upgraded all my systems to CentOS 5.1 I have been<br>
> getting reports from users about "all their windows disappearing". A<br>
> little digging revealed that they meant all gnome-terminal windows.<br>
> Since there is only one gnome-terminal process by default for all<br>
> your open terminal windows and tabs, a crash of that process means<br>
> losing all your terminal windows. These crashes often (but not<br>
> always) occur over night when the system is otherwise idle.<br>
><br>
> A quick Google search found a problem on Ubuntu related to VTE (the<br>
> terminal emulator widget used by gnome-terminal) but not much else of<br>
> interest. Has anyone on this list experienced this? I find it hard<br>
> to believe I'm the only one. I never saw this issue while running<br>
> CentOS 4.X on these systems...<br>
><br>
> Alfred<br>
><br>
<br>
I've seen extreme slow gnome terminals in the past on Cent 5, I even<br>
downgraded the package for the terminal to make it work better.<br>
<br>
Never had it close randomly. I have however had applications randomly<br>
close other then the terminal.<br>
<br>
Gregg.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 41<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 13:42:09 -0500<br>
From: Johnny Hughes <<a href="mailto:johnny@centos.org">johnny@centos.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: centos on ebox<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483EF901.6090905@centos.org">483EF901.6090905@centos.org</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Jerry Geis wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> now do:<br>
>><br>
>> i586 text mem=128<br>
>><br>
>><br>
> when I do "i586 text mem=128" it says cant find kernel<br>
> so I do "linux i586 text mem=128" and I get the same behavior<br>
> Loading vmlinuz....<br>
> Loading initrd....<br>
> and reboot.<br>
><br>
> Am I not correctly specifying the kernel yet?<br>
><br>
<br>
Are you sure this is a CD-1 and not a ServerCD ???<br>
<br>
i586 text<br>
<br>
THAT should work<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: signature.asc<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 252 bytes<br>
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/83b9661a/signature-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/83b9661a/signature-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 42<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 13:48:20 -0500<br>
From: Johnny Hughes <<a href="mailto:johnny@centos.org">johnny@centos.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Frequent Gnome Terminal crashes in CentOS 5.1<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483EFA74.5080001@centos.org">483EFA74.5080001@centos.org</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Alfred von Campe wrote:<br>
> Ever since I upgraded all my systems to CentOS 5.1 I have been getting<br>
> reports from users about "all their windows disappearing". A little<br>
> digging revealed that they meant all gnome-terminal windows. Since<br>
> there is only one gnome-terminal process by default for all your open<br>
> terminal windows and tabs, a crash of that process means losing all your<br>
> terminal windows. These crashes often (but not always) occur over night<br>
> when the system is otherwise idle.<br>
><br>
> A quick Google search found a problem on Ubuntu related to VTE (the<br>
> terminal emulator widget used by gnome-terminal) but not much else of<br>
> interest. Has anyone on this list experienced this? I find it hard to<br>
> believe I'm the only one. I never saw this issue while running CentOS<br>
> 4.X on these systems...<br>
><br>
<br>
How did you upgrade?<br>
<br>
I am running CentOS-5 on many workstations that stay on all the time and<br>
I have never had the gnome-terminal crash.<br>
<br>
Is it possible that you have older (possibly orphaned) binaries still<br>
installed from the upgrade process?<br>
<br>
If this is from a NEW install, then we need more info to help.<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: signature.asc<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 252 bytes<br>
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/09205167/signature-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/09205167/signature-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 43<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 14:52:11 -0400<br>
From: Jerry Geis <<a href="mailto:geisj@pagestation.com">geisj@pagestation.com</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS] Re: centos on ebox<br>
To: CentOS ML <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483EFB5B.3000209@pagestation.com">483EFB5B.3000209@pagestation.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>
<br>
><br>
> Jerry Geis wrote:<br>
> >>/<br>
> />>/ now do:<br>
> />>/<br>
> />>/ i586 text mem=128<br>
> />>/<br>
> />>/<br>
> />/ when I do "i586 text mem=128" it says cant find kernel<br>
> />/ so I do "linux i586 text mem=128" and I get the same behavior<br>
> />/ Loading vmlinuz....<br>
> />/ Loading initrd....<br>
> />/ and reboot.<br>
> />/<br>
> />/ Am I not correctly specifying the kernel yet?<br>
> />/<br>
> /<br>
> Are you sure this is a CD-1 and not a ServerCD ???<br>
><br>
> i586 text<br>
><br>
> THAT should work<br>
><br>
Sure enough I had the centos 4 server CD, I looked deaper and got the CD<br>
disk 1 out of my pack<br>
and "i586 text" does a BUNCH more... thanks.<br>
<br>
Now I see on the screen that hda is discovered on the IDE interface as a<br>
1 GIG device.<br>
The last 2 lines printed are:<br>
<br>
Cannot open root device "<NULL>" or unknown block (8,3)<br>
kernel panic not syncing unable to mount root.<br>
<br>
What do I do with that?<br>
<br>
Everything above that looks normal as detect PS/2 etc...<br>
<br>
Jerry<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 44<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 13:52:25 -0500<br>
From: Johnny Hughes <<a href="mailto:johnny@centos.org">johnny@centos.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Setting up a chroot<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483EFB69.3050509@centos.org">483EFB69.3050509@centos.org</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
MHR wrote:<br>
> I'm trying to build GNOME (to run a more recent version than 2.16.* on<br>
> CentOS 5.1) and I keep running into a lot of rather strange problems.<br>
><br>
> I'm wondering if this might have something to do with my hybrid 64 and<br>
> 32 bit general environment, so I want to try a pure 64-bit chroot.<br>
><br>
> I've never done this before, and I'm not entirely sure how to, and I<br>
> didn't see anything particularly on point, either at <a href="http://centos.org" target="_blank">centos.org</a> or<br>
> google. If I missed it, just say where and that should be enough.<br>
><br>
> Guidelines? Suggestions (other than "go away" or other physically<br>
> difficult crudities :-)?<br>
><br>
<br>
Probably the best thing to do is to use mock to build in.<br>
<br>
You provide it with some repos and it automatically creates a chroot to<br>
build things.<br>
<br>
<br>
<a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock" target="_blank">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock</a><br>
<br>
That has some instructions, though you should be able to yum install mock.<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: signature.asc<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 252 bytes<br>
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/b4b64779/signature-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/b4b64779/signature-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 45<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:55:48 -0600<br>
From: "Joseph L. Casale" <<a href="mailto:JCasale@activenetwerx.com">JCasale@activenetwerx.com</a>><br>
Subject: RE: [CentOS] /etc/sysctl.conf edit not permanent<br>
To: 'CentOS mailing list' <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE06F0C8F322A@Mail.activenetwerx.int">49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE06F0C8F322A@Mail.activenetwerx.int</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii<br>
<br>
>I expect that you will see "net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1"<br>
><br>
>Please confirm.<br>
><br>
>Barry<br>
<br>
You were right, thanks for the info.<br>
jlc<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 46<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 11:58:49 -0700 (PDT)<br>
From: Joe Pruett <<a href="mailto:joey@clean.q7.com">joey@clean.q7.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40 second delay on automounts with<br>
2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 kernel<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:alpine.LRH.1.10.0805291157360.2794@q7.q7.com">alpine.LRH.1.10.0805291157360.2794@q7.q7.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed<br>
<br>
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote:<br>
<br>
> This is already solved on another thread ... but for closure on this one,<br>
> there is a known bug here with that kernel and ipsec:<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853" target="_blank">http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853</a><br>
<br>
that bug entry does say to use the upstream bug for info about a<br>
workaround, but the upstream bug is blocked to mere mortals. is there a<br>
workaround other than just using the older kernel?<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 47<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 15:13:18 -0400<br>
From: Jerry Geis <<a href="mailto:geisj@pagestation.com">geisj@pagestation.com</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS] Re: centos on ebox<br>
To: CentOS ML <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483F004E.3050906@pagestation.com">483F004E.3050906@pagestation.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>
<br>
Jerry Geis wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Jerry Geis wrote:<br>
>> >>/<br>
>> />>/ now do:<br>
>> />>/<br>
>> />>/ i586 text mem=128<br>
>> />>/<br>
>> />>/ />/ when I do "i586 text mem=128" it says cant find kernel<br>
>> />/ so I do "linux i586 text mem=128" and I get the same behavior<br>
>> />/ Loading vmlinuz....<br>
>> />/ Loading initrd....<br>
>> />/ and reboot.<br>
>> />/ />/ Am I not correctly specifying the kernel yet?<br>
>> />/ /<br>
>> Are you sure this is a CD-1 and not a ServerCD ???<br>
>><br>
>> i586 text<br>
>><br>
>> THAT should work<br>
>><br>
> Sure enough I had the centos 4 server CD, I looked deaper and got the<br>
> CD disk 1 out of my pack<br>
> and "i586 text" does a BUNCH more... thanks.<br>
><br>
> Now I see on the screen that hda is discovered on the IDE interface as<br>
> a 1 GIG device.<br>
> The last 2 lines printed are:<br>
><br>
> Cannot open root device "<NULL>" or unknown block (8,3)<br>
> kernel panic not syncing unable to mount root.<br>
><br>
> What do I do with that?<br>
><br>
> Everything above that looks normal as detect PS/2 etc...<br>
><br>
> Jerry<br>
><br>
I am booting now with "i586 text mem=128M root=/dev/hda"<br>
<br>
and I am well into the menus of installing now...<br>
<br>
Thanks all for the suggestions.<br>
<br>
Jerry<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 48<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 15:14:31 -0400<br>
From: Alfred von Campe <<a href="mailto:alfred@von-campe.com">alfred@von-campe.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Frequent Gnome Terminal crashes in CentOS 5.1<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:FA326913-1514-41EC-9420-CE8FDFD03FEB@von-campe.com">FA326913-1514-41EC-9420-CE8FDFD03FEB@von-campe.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed<br>
<br>
On May 29, 2008, at 14:48, Johnny Hughes wrote:<br>
<br>
> How did you upgrade?<br>
<br>
Fresh install via kickstart. I reformatted the root and /boot<br>
partitions, but left one user partition untouched.<br>
<br>
> Is it possible that you have older (possibly orphaned) binaries<br>
> still installed from the upgrade process?<br>
<br>
I don't think this is possible since I reformatted the root partition<br>
(I only have /, /boot, and /scratch partitions in addition to a swap<br>
partition).<br>
<br>
> If this is from a NEW install, then we need more info to help.<br>
<br>
The process ends without leaving a trace unfortunately (at least that<br>
I can find). I did have an strace running on one system attached to<br>
the gnone-terminal process and it finally died after 5 days or so.<br>
Here are the last 20 lines from the log:<br>
<br>
open("/usr/share/X11/XErrorDB", O_RDONLY) = 27<br>
fstat64(27, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=37949, ...}) = 0<br>
read(27, "! $Xorg: XErrorDB,v 1.3 2000/08/"..., 37949) = 37949<br>
close(27) = 0<br>
write(2, "The program \'gnome-terminal\' rec"..., 592) = 592<br>
close(18) = 0<br>
kill(15700, SIGTERM) = 0<br>
writev(14, [{"GIOP\1\2\1\5\0\0\0\0", 12}], 1) = 12<br>
close(14) = 0<br>
writev(15, [{"GIOP\1\2\1\5\0\0\0\0", 12}], 1) = 12<br>
close(15) = 0<br>
writev(13, [{"GIOP\1\2\1\5\0\0\0\0", 12}], 1) = 12<br>
close(13) = 0<br>
writev(11, [{"GIOP\1\2\1\5\0\0\0\0", 12}], 1) = 12<br>
close(11) = 0<br>
close(9) = 0<br>
close(8) = 0<br>
unlink("/tmp/orbit-kb12698/linc-3d51-0-2491c193d89b6") = 0<br>
close(12) = 0<br>
exit_group(1) = ?<br>
<br>
Is there a better way than strace to get some information on this crash?<br>
<br>
Alfred<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 49<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:18:55 -0700<br>
From: Scott Silva <<a href="mailto:ssilva@sgvwater.com">ssilva@sgvwater.com</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS] Re: centos on ebox<br>
To: <a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a><br>
Message-ID: <g1mvj4$ir0$<a href="mailto:1@ger.gmane.org">1@ger.gmane.org</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
on 5-29-2008 11:52 AM Jerry Geis spake the following:<br>
>><br>
>> Jerry Geis wrote:<br>
>> >>/<br>
>> />>/ now do:<br>
>> />>/<br>
>> />>/ i586 text mem=128<br>
>> />>/<br>
>> />>/ />/ when I do "i586 text mem=128" it says cant find kernel<br>
>> />/ so I do "linux i586 text mem=128" and I get the same behavior<br>
>> />/ Loading vmlinuz....<br>
>> />/ Loading initrd....<br>
>> />/ and reboot.<br>
>> />/ />/ Am I not correctly specifying the kernel yet?<br>
>> />/ /<br>
>> Are you sure this is a CD-1 and not a ServerCD ???<br>
>><br>
>> i586 text<br>
>><br>
>> THAT should work<br>
>><br>
> Sure enough I had the centos 4 server CD, I looked deaper and got the CD<br>
> disk 1 out of my pack<br>
> and "i586 text" does a BUNCH more... thanks.<br>
><br>
> Now I see on the screen that hda is discovered on the IDE interface as a<br>
> 1 GIG device.<br>
> The last 2 lines printed are:<br>
><br>
> Cannot open root device "<NULL>" or unknown block (8,3)<br>
> kernel panic not syncing unable to mount root.<br>
><br>
> What do I do with that?<br>
><br>
> Everything above that looks normal as detect PS/2 etc...<br>
><br>
> Jerry<br>
It must be either the hardware or a bad disc as I just did a quick install in<br>
vmware with 128 Mgs of ram and it went OK.<br>
<br>
--<br>
MailScanner is like deodorant...<br>
You hope everybody uses it, and<br>
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: signature.asc<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 258 bytes<br>
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/ac5a75e1/signature-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/ac5a75e1/signature-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 50<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 20:42:17 +0100<br>
From: Ned Slider <<a href="mailto:ned@unixmail.co.uk">ned@unixmail.co.uk</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40 second delay on automounts with<br>
2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 kernel<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483F0719.80700@unixmail.co.uk">483F0719.80700@unixmail.co.uk</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>
<br>
Joe Pruett wrote:<br>
> On Thu, 29 May 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote:<br>
><br>
>> This is already solved on another thread ... but for closure on this<br>
>> one, there is a known bug here with that kernel and ipsec:<br>
>><br>
>> <a href="http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853" target="_blank">http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853</a><br>
><br>
> that bug entry does say to use the upstream bug for info about a<br>
> workaround, but the upstream bug is blocked to mere mortals. is there a<br>
> workaround other than just using the older kernel?<br>
<br>
<br>
Did you see the added note?<br>
<br>
I quote:<br>
<br>
"For the benefit of those who do not have access to the upstream<br>
bugzilla report, this bug has been fixed in the updated 5.2 kernel<br>
(version number 2.6.18-92.el5), and this kernel also contains the<br>
CVE-2007-6282 patch. I would recommend that people affected by this bug<br>
upgrade to 2.6.18-92.el5."<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 51<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 13:02:16 -0700<br>
From: Scott Silva <<a href="mailto:ssilva@sgvwater.com">ssilva@sgvwater.com</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS] Re: 40 second delay on automounts with<br>
2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 kernel<br>
To: <a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a><br>
Message-ID: <g1n248$st6$<a href="mailto:1@ger.gmane.org">1@ger.gmane.org</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
on 5-29-2008 12:42 PM Ned Slider spake the following:<br>
> Joe Pruett wrote:<br>
>> On Thu, 29 May 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> This is already solved on another thread ... but for closure on this<br>
>>> one, there is a known bug here with that kernel and ipsec:<br>
>>><br>
>>> <a href="http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853" target="_blank">http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853</a><br>
>><br>
>> that bug entry does say to use the upstream bug for info about a<br>
>> workaround, but the upstream bug is blocked to mere mortals. is there<br>
>> a workaround other than just using the older kernel?<br>
><br>
><br>
> Did you see the added note?<br>
><br>
> I quote:<br>
><br>
> "For the benefit of those who do not have access to the upstream<br>
> bugzilla report, this bug has been fixed in the updated 5.2 kernel<br>
> (version number 2.6.18-92.el5), and this kernel also contains the<br>
> CVE-2007-6282 patch. I would recommend that people affected by this bug<br>
> upgrade to 2.6.18-92.el5."<br>
Is that the kernel to be released with 5.2?<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
MailScanner is like deodorant...<br>
You hope everybody uses it, and<br>
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: signature.asc<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 258 bytes<br>
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/897a60d3/signature-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/897a60d3/signature-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 52<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 15:21:56 -0500<br>
From: Johnny Hughes <<a href="mailto:johnny@centos.org">johnny@centos.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: 40 second delay on automounts with<br>
2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 kernel<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483F1064.3030300@centos.org">483F1064.3030300@centos.org</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Scott Silva wrote:<br>
> on 5-29-2008 12:42 PM Ned Slider spake the following:<br>
>> Joe Pruett wrote:<br>
>>> On Thu, 29 May 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>>> This is already solved on another thread ... but for closure on this<br>
>>>> one, there is a known bug here with that kernel and ipsec:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> <a href="http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853" target="_blank">http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> that bug entry does say to use the upstream bug for info about a<br>
>>> workaround, but the upstream bug is blocked to mere mortals. is<br>
>>> there a workaround other than just using the older kernel?<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Did you see the added note?<br>
>><br>
>> I quote:<br>
>><br>
>> "For the benefit of those who do not have access to the upstream<br>
>> bugzilla report, this bug has been fixed in the updated 5.2 kernel<br>
>> (version number 2.6.18-92.el5), and this kernel also contains the<br>
>> CVE-2007-6282 patch. I would recommend that people affected by this<br>
>> bug upgrade to 2.6.18-92.el5."<br>
> Is that the kernel to be released with 5.2?<br>
<br>
yes ... and we have it built already ... but I am not sure everything<br>
else that might need to go with it. module-init-tools and mkinitrd are<br>
also upgrades so those for sure<br>
<br>
But rather than releasing pieces, I would think that using the older<br>
kernels on ipsec machines would be best for a couple weeks.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: signature.asc<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 252 bytes<br>
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/c6c0f834/signature-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/c6c0f834/signature-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 53<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 13:23:07 -0700<br>
From: MHR <<a href="mailto:mhullrich@gmail.com">mhullrich@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Frequent Gnome Terminal crashes in CentOS 5.1<br>
To: "CentOS mailing list" <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:f4e013870805291323m29774f82xd963d67b8e47eec4@mail.gmail.com">f4e013870805291323m29774f82xd963d67b8e47eec4@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br>
<br>
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Alfred von Campe <<a href="mailto:alfred@von-campe.com">alfred@von-campe.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Fresh install via kickstart. I reformatted the root and /boot partitions,<br>
> but left one user partition untouched.<br>
><br>
> I don't think this is possible since I reformatted the root partition (I<br>
> only have /, /boot, and /scratch partitions in addition to a swap<br>
> partition).<br>
><br>
> The process ends without leaving a trace unfortunately (at least that I can<br>
> find). I did have an strace running on one system attached to the<br>
> gnone-terminal process and it finally died after 5 days or so. Here are the<br>
> last 20 lines from the log:<br>
><br>
<br>
Is it possible you have some kind of time-out set, like an idle time<br>
cut-off? If it's only happening at night, this might explain it.<br>
<br>
I have Seamonkey crashes and strange behavior related to nautilus<br>
windows when I try to open Netowrk Connections, but I've never seen or<br>
heard of anything like this.<br>
<br>
mhr<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 54<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 17:55:05 -0400<br>
From: "William L. Maltby" <<a href="mailto:CentOS4Bill@triad.rr.com">CentOS4Bill@triad.rr.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] FireFox<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <1212098105.3714.4.camel@centos501.homegroannetworking><br>
Content-Type: text/plain<br>
<br>
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 13:09 +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:<br>
> >>>>> On Tue, 27 May 2008 21:51:07 -0400<br>
> >>>>> "WLM" == William L Maltby <<a href="mailto:CentOS4Bill@triad.rr.com">CentOS4Bill@triad.rr.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> <snip><br>
<br>
> WLM> I chose not to uninstall the distributed one. I unpackaed the<br>
> WLM> 3.0rc1 tarball in the $HOME of a user and run it from there.<br>
><br>
> <snipped recipe><br>
><br>
> WLM> This lets all other users get the box-stock version while I<br>
> WLM> test the new one. So far it's looking pretty good.<br>
><br>
> Question: if I do this, will I be able to move back to the<br>
> stock-1.5-version without problems. In other words: is the stuff like<br>
> bookmarks, history etc that is written to disk backward-compatible?<br>
<br>
Last time I did something like this was with the beta 5 release. In that<br>
case I removed the box version and installed globally. Going that<br>
direction, the per-user config files seemed to hold as normal. Once I<br>
discovered that the needed Java app wouldn't work, I uninstalled the<br>
beta, reinstalled box-stock.<br>
<br>
Again, no config issues.<br>
<br>
Before everybody beats me like a rented mule, there was no risk to other<br>
users - I'm it, just with different logons. So I felt comfortable with<br>
picking up the pieces if it broke and did not grab one of my other<br>
machines for testing.<br>
<br>
> <snip sig stuff><br>
<br>
HTH<br>
--<br>
Bill<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 55<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 17:19:44 -0500<br>
From: "Tom Bishop" <<a href="mailto:bishoptf@gmail.com">bishoptf@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centosplus vmware kernels....???<br>
To: "CentOS mailing list" <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:fc808e200805291519x6829323dk60427b801171b592@mail.gmail.com">fc808e200805291519x6829323dk60427b801171b592@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Thanks Tru and Johnny, one more question. Can I just use the<br>
centos5-testing repo, ie, yum enablerepoxxx install kernel-vm? I ask<br>
because I tried and while it worked it loaded an older kernel. Should I<br>
just go to tru's directory and install the RPM directly? Also, ok more than<br>
one question, are the open-vm-tools in the same repo or only found in<br>
Johnny's testing directory. Thanks again...<br>
<br>
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Les Mikesell <<a href="mailto:lesmikesell@gmail.com">lesmikesell@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Ruslan Sivak wrote:<br>
><br>
>><br>
>>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> Thanks to Tru, kernel-vm is all up-to-date and you can find it here:<br>
>>><br>
>>> <a href="http://people.centos.org/tru/kernel-vm/" target="_blank">http://people.centos.org/tru/kernel-vm/</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> and yes, using the clocksource=pit option should not be an issue with<br>
>>> these kernels.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Akemi<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>> So if I understand this correctly, one should not be using a stock kernel<br>
>> when running inside a vm, but should use the kernel-vm kernel?<br>
>><br>
><br>
> It depends on the host hardware and OS - many combinations have trouble<br>
> servicing the 1000hz guest clock which has to be simulated in software.<br>
> Also, some host systems have variable speed CPUs controlled by power<br>
> managment which throws off the guests:<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1591" target="_blank">http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1591</a><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Les Mikesell<br>
> <a href="mailto:lesmikesell@gmail.com">lesmikesell@gmail.com</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> CentOS mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:CentOS@centos.org">CentOS@centos.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos</a><br>
><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/abd5e7e2/attachment-0001.htm" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/abd5e7e2/attachment-0001.htm</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 56<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 20:01:48 -0300<br>
From: "Sergio Belkin" <<a href="mailto:sebelk@gmail.com">sebelk@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS] Negative Values in delay pools<br>
To: "CentOS mailing list" <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:8c6f7f450805291601k6e15c9edk623bf1f9b111fb5f@mail.gmail.com">8c6f7f450805291601k6e15c9edk623bf1f9b111fb5f@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br>
<br>
Hi,<br>
I configured delay pools on squid. I get the following from squidclient:<br>
<br>
Delay pools configured: 2<br>
<br>
Pool: 1<br>
Class: 1<br>
<br>
Aggregate:<br>
Disabled.<br>
<br>
Pool: 2<br>
Class: 1<br>
<br>
Aggregate:<br>
Max: 187500<br>
Restore: 187500<br>
Current: -6<br>
<br>
Memory Used: 624 bytes<br>
<br>
End of Output<br>
<br>
What does mean Current with a negative value?<br>
<br>
Thanks in advance<br>
<br>
--<br>
--<br>
Open Kairos <a href="http://www.openkairos.com" target="_blank">http://www.openkairos.com</a><br>
Watch More TV <a href="http://sebelk.blogspot.com" target="_blank">http://sebelk.blogspot.com</a><br>
Sergio Belkin -<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 57<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 20:58:14 -0400<br>
From: "Filipe Brandenburger" <<a href="mailto:filbranden@gmail.com">filbranden@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Frequent Gnome Terminal crashes in CentOS 5.1<br>
To: "CentOS mailing list" <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:e814db780805291758l5b74dff5rc0d9233b025e19d4@mail.gmail.com">e814db780805291758l5b74dff5rc0d9233b025e19d4@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br>
<br>
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Alfred von Campe <<a href="mailto:alfred@von-campe.com">alfred@von-campe.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> write(2, "The program \'gnome-terminal\' rec"..., 592) = 592<br>
<br>
This looks interesting, but unfortunately you cut the message too<br>
short to know what it was saying... You might find it in<br>
/var/log/Xorg.0.log, but I wouldn't bet on that.<br>
<br>
> Is there a better way than strace to get some information on this crash?<br>
<br>
strace seems fine, just use some options to enhance the output you get:<br>
-s 1024: take 1024 bytes for every string. This wouldn't have cut that one short<br>
-tt: if you want timestamps<br>
-f: to follow forked processes<br>
<br>
I almost always call strace like this:<br>
<br>
$ strace -f -tt -s 1024 -o /tmp/strace_PROCESSNAME.$$ PIDOFTHEPROCESS<br>
<br>
Try to do it again and you might find out what gnome-terminal was<br>
trying to tell you.<br>
<br>
HTH,<br>
Filipe<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 58<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 20:59:19 -0400<br>
From: "Filipe Brandenburger" <<a href="mailto:filbranden@gmail.com">filbranden@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Frequent Gnome Terminal crashes in CentOS 5.1<br>
To: "CentOS mailing list" <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:e814db780805291759m203c1391q4f084f7ba66501b3@mail.gmail.com">e814db780805291759m203c1391q4f084f7ba66501b3@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br>
<br>
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Filipe Brandenburger<br>
<<a href="mailto:filbranden@gmail.com">filbranden@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Alfred von Campe <<a href="mailto:alfred@von-campe.com">alfred@von-campe.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> write(2, "The program \'gnome-terminal\' rec"..., 592) = 592<br>
><br>
> This looks interesting, but unfortunately you cut the message too<br>
> short to know what it was saying... You might find it in<br>
> /var/log/Xorg.0.log, but I wouldn't bet on that.<br>
<br>
Try ~/.xsession-errors, that's a more likely place to find the error message.<br>
<br>
HTH,<br>
Filipe<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 59<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 22:21:39 -0500<br>
From: Jay Leafey <<a href="mailto:jay.leafey@mindless.com">jay.leafey@mindless.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] GFS<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483F72C3.9070107@mindless.com">483F72C3.9070107@mindless.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Mag Gam wrote:<br>
> Hello:<br>
><br>
> I am planning to implement GFS for my university as a summer project. I<br>
> have 10 servers each with SAN disks attached. I will be reading and<br>
> writing many files for professor's research projects. Each file can be<br>
> anywhere from 1k to 120GB (fluid dynamic research images). The 10<br>
> servers will be using NIC bonding (1GB/network). So, would GFS be ideal<br>
> for this? I have been reading a lot about it and it seems like a perfect<br>
> solution.<br>
><br>
> Any thoughts?<br>
><br>
> TIA<br>
><br>
<br>
"Perfect"? No, but usable. We've got a cluster of 4 systems attached<br>
to a fibre-channel-based SAN running CentOS 4 and the Cluster Suite<br>
components with multiple instances of the Oracle database. It actually<br>
works pretty well and fails over nicely in the case of exceptions. It<br>
is moderately complex to set up, but the information needed REALLY IS in<br>
the docs... you just have to REALLY read them!<br>
<br>
We haven't tried CentOS 5 and the new cluster components as Oracle only<br>
supports the version of the database we're running on Red Hat EL4.<br>
Given that, the combination looks a bit more "finished" than the<br>
versions in EL4.<br>
<br>
Another alternative that we are examining is using OCFS2 (Oracle Cluster<br>
File System 2) and iSCSI for the shared storage with Heartbeat for<br>
service management. This combination looks to be a bit "lighter" than<br>
the Cluster Suite and GFS, but I'm hoping to confirm or disprove that<br>
impression this summer in my "copious free time".<br>
<br>
As usual, you mileage may vary.<br>
--<br>
Jay Leafey - Memphis, TN<br>
<a href="mailto:jay.leafey@mindless.com">jay.leafey@mindless.com</a><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: smime.p7s<br>
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature<br>
Size: 5177 bytes<br>
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/a677a6d5/smime-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/a677a6d5/smime-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 60<br>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 11:43:47 +0800<br>
From: Christopher Chan <<a href="mailto:christopher@ias.com.hk">christopher@ias.com.hk</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Learning some sad things about the state of IPv6<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483F77F3.4090400@ias.com.hk">483F77F3.4090400@ias.com.hk</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>
<br>
Robert Moskowitz wrote:<br>
> We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall<br>
> support.<br>
><br>
> That requires at least the 2.6.20 kernel, which means Fedora Core 6 or<br>
> some other Linux distro.<br>
><br>
> None of the various free Linux firewalls have IPv6 support. Supposedly<br>
> FWBuilder can manage Netfilters for a Linux Kernel, but that seems to be<br>
> the extent of it.<br>
><br>
> More sad facts as I uncover them.....<br>
<br>
Just use openbsd. We cannot expect Linux to rule everything. Use what<br>
best fits the job.<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 61<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 23:53:12 -0400<br>
From: "Matt Shields" <<a href="mailto:mattboston@gmail.com">mattboston@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Learning some sad things about the state of IPv6<br>
To: "CentOS mailing list" <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:100716920805292053q1c1d26ecqa18ae7635b8c687c@mail.gmail.com">100716920805292053q1c1d26ecqa18ae7635b8c687c@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br>
<br>
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Christopher Chan<br>
<<a href="mailto:christopher@ias.com.hk">christopher@ias.com.hk</a>> wrote:<br>
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall<br>
>> support.<br>
>><br>
>> That requires at least the 2.6.20 kernel, which means Fedora Core 6 or<br>
>> some other Linux distro.<br>
>><br>
>> None of the various free Linux firewalls have IPv6 support. Supposedly<br>
>> FWBuilder can manage Netfilters for a Linux Kernel, but that seems to be the<br>
>> extent of it.<br>
>><br>
>> More sad facts as I uncover them.....<br>
><br>
> Just use openbsd. We cannot expect Linux to rule everything. Use what best<br>
> fits the job.<br>
<br>
Not sure about FC6, but in both CentOS 4 & 5 there is an ip6tables. I<br>
haven't used it, but I'm assuming that you can build rules just like<br>
you do with iptables.<br>
<br>
--<br>
-matt<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 62<br>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 22:57:32 -0500<br>
From: "Rob Townley" <<a href="mailto:rob.townley@gmail.com">rob.townley@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Learning some sad things about the state of IPv6<br>
To: "CentOS mailing list" <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:7e84ed60805292057ra4bb873r71abf40eb1f91d17@mail.gmail.com">7e84ed60805292057ra4bb873r71abf40eb1f91d17@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Matt Shields <<a href="mailto:mattboston@gmail.com">mattboston@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Christopher Chan<br>
> <<a href="mailto:christopher@ias.com.hk">christopher@ias.com.hk</a>> wrote:<br>
> > Robert Moskowitz wrote:<br>
> >><br>
> >> We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall<br>
> >> support.<br>
> >><br>
> >> That requires at least the 2.6.20 kernel, which means Fedora Core 6 or<br>
> >> some other Linux distro.<br>
> >><br>
> >> None of the various free Linux firewalls have IPv6 support. Supposedly<br>
> >> FWBuilder can manage Netfilters for a Linux Kernel, but that seems to be<br>
> the<br>
> >> extent of it.<br>
> >><br>
> >> More sad facts as I uncover them.....<br>
> ><br>
> > Just use openbsd. We cannot expect Linux to rule everything. Use what<br>
> best<br>
> > fits the job.<br>
><br>
> Not sure about FC6, but in both CentOS 4 & 5 there is an ip6tables. I<br>
> haven't used it, but I'm assuming that you can build rules just like<br>
> you do with iptables.<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> -matt<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> CentOS mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:CentOS@centos.org">CentOS@centos.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos</a><br>
><br>
<br>
My dd-wrt web page has a IPv6 checkbox, but don't know what it does. i am<br>
shunning IPv6 bc securing the private side of a NAT is hard enough.<br>
Securing IPv6 seems much much much tougher.<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/c2b6ef9d/attachment-0001.htm" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080529/c2b6ef9d/attachment-0001.htm</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 63<br>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 12:13:28 +0800<br>
From: Christopher Chan <<a href="mailto:christopher@ias.com.hk">christopher@ias.com.hk</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Learning some sad things about the state of IPv6<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483F7EE8.90303@ias.com.hk">483F7EE8.90303@ias.com.hk</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>
<br>
Matt Shields wrote:<br>
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Christopher Chan<br>
> <<a href="mailto:christopher@ias.com.hk">christopher@ias.com.hk</a>> wrote:<br>
>> Robert Moskowitz wrote:<br>
>>> We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall<br>
>>> support.<br>
>>><br>
<br>
> Not sure about FC6, but in both CentOS 4 & 5 there is an ip6tables. I<br>
> haven't used it, but I'm assuming that you can build rules just like<br>
> you do with iptables.<br>
><br>
<br>
The OP is not saying there is no ipv6 netfilter support. He said that<br>
there is no ipv6 state netfilter module or something like that.<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 64<br>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 00:22:39 -0400<br>
From: Robert Spangler <<a href="mailto:mlists@zoominternet.net">mlists@zoominternet.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] FireFox<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:200805300022.39665.mlists@zoominternet.net">200805300022.39665.mlists@zoominternet.net</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 20:19, MHR wrote:<br>
<br>
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Robert Spangler<br>
><br>
> <<a href="mailto:mlists@zoominternet.net">mlists@zoominternet.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> > Can I use one out of the Fedora's repos? If so, which repo?<br>
><br>
> You can just pull down the latest version from <a href="http://mozilla.org" target="_blank">mozilla.org</a> - they're<br>
> pretty good about compatibility. I'd try it out in a different<br>
> install directory, though, just to be sure, but you can always<br>
> uninstall it and re-load the release version if it doesn't work right<br>
> for you.<br>
<br>
I downloaded the tar file from Mozilla and placed it under my home Dir. Seems<br>
to be working fine presently. After some more tests if there are no issues<br>
I'll replace 1.5 with 2.0. Thank for your help.<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
Robert<br>
<br>
Smile... it increases your face value!<br>
Linux User #296285<br>
<a href="http://counter.li.org" target="_blank">http://counter.li.org</a><br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 65<br>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 08:54:48 +0200<br>
From: Sebastian Marten <<a href="mailto:sebi4711@gmail.com">sebi4711@gmail.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Config for NFSv4 an Kerberos on CentOS 5.1<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483FA4B8.4050405@gmail.com">483FA4B8.4050405@gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Hi,<br>
<br>
Barry Brimer schrieb:<br>
> Quoting Sebastian Marten <<a href="mailto:sebi4711@gmail.com">sebi4711@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
><br>
>> Hi list,<br>
>> Is it possible to set up an NFSv4/Kerberos environment on CentOS 5.1?<br>
>> I set up Kerberos and NFS but get several erros<br>
>><br>
>> "Warning: rpc.gssd appears not to be running.<br>
>> mount.nfs4: Permission denied"<br>
>><br>
>> Is this an CentOS oder an config problem?<br>
><br>
> Yes.<br>
><br>
> Are you running all of the gss services?<br>
> Is portmap running?<br>
> Did you uncomment the SECURE_NFS="yes" in /etc/sysconfig/nfs?<br>
> Was your kerberos principal created with:<br>
> "addprinc -randkey -e des-cbc-md5:normal nfs/<a href="http://server.domain.com" target="_blank">server.domain.com</a>"<br>
> Was your keytab entry created with:<br>
> "ktadd -e des-cbc-md5:normal nfs/<a href="http://server.domain.com" target="_blank">server.domain.com</a>"<br>
> Do you have gss/krb5p just before the nfs options in parentheses?<br>
><br>
<br>
I've done all this + add princs for the host. (tested with ds and<br>
ds.example.lan)<br>
<br>
I get this error:<br>
ds rpc.svcgssd[4686]: ERROR: GSS-API: error in gss_acquire_cred():<br>
Unspecified GSS failure. Minor code may provide more information - No<br>
principal in keytab matches desired name<br>
ds rpc.svcgssd[4686]: Unable to obtain credentials for 'nfs'<br>
ds rpc.svcgssd[4686]: unable to obtain root (machine) credentials<br>
ds rpc.svcgssd[4686]: do you have a keytab entry for<br>
nfs/<your.host>@<YOUR.REALM> in /etc/krb5.keytab?<br>
<br>
But: kadmin.local listprincs return:<br>
<br>
K/<a href="mailto:M@EXAMPLE.COM">M@EXAMPLE.COM</a><br>
host/<a href="mailto:ds.example.lan@EXAMPLE.COM">ds.example.lan@EXAMPLE.COM</a><br>
host/<a href="mailto:ds@EXAMPLE.COM">ds@EXAMPLE.COM</a><br>
kadmin/<a href="mailto:admin@EXAMPLE.COM">admin@EXAMPLE.COM</a><br>
kadmin/<a href="mailto:changepw@EXAMPLE.COM">changepw@EXAMPLE.COM</a><br>
kadmin/<a href="mailto:history@EXAMPLE.COM">history@EXAMPLE.COM</a><br>
kadmin/<a href="mailto:localhost.localdomain@EXAMPLE.COM">localhost.localdomain@EXAMPLE.COM</a><br>
krbtgt/<a href="http://EXAMPLE.COM" target="_blank">EXAMPLE.COM</a>@<a href="http://EXAMPLE.COM" target="_blank">EXAMPLE.COM</a><br>
nfs/<a href="mailto:ds.example.lan@EXAMPLE.COM">ds.example.lan@EXAMPLE.COM</a><br>
nfs/<a href="mailto:ds@EXAMPLE.COM">ds@EXAMPLE.COM</a><br>
root/<a href="mailto:admin@EXAMPLE.COM">admin@EXAMPLE.COM</a><br>
<a href="mailto:root@EXAMPLE.COM">root@EXAMPLE.COM</a><br>
<br>
The hostname is ds.example.lan<br>
<br>
/tec/krb5.conf points on the right server.<br>
<br>
kinit and klist works<br>
<br>
kinit<br>
Password for <a href="mailto:root@EXAMPLE.COM">root@EXAMPLE.COM</a>:<br>
[root@ds ~]# klist<br>
Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0<br>
Default principal: <a href="mailto:root@EXAMPLE.COM">root@EXAMPLE.COM</a><br>
<br>
Valid starting Expires Service principal<br>
05/30/08 08:52:48 05/31/08 08:52:47 krbtgt/<a href="http://EXAMPLE.COM" target="_blank">EXAMPLE.COM</a>@<a href="http://EXAMPLE.COM" target="_blank">EXAMPLE.COM</a><br>
<br>
<br>
Kerberos 4 ticket cache: /tmp/tkt0<br>
klist: You have no tickets cached<br>
<br>
<br>
There is my problem?<br>
<br>
<br>
> Hope this helps.<br>
><br>
> Barry<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: signature.asc<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 542 bytes<br>
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080530/13fcd479/signature-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080530/13fcd479/signature-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 66<br>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 12:26:21 +0530<br>
From: "gopinath" <<a href="mailto:gopinath@signal-networks.com">gopinath@signal-networks.com</a>><br>
Subject: [CentOS] offline file shares<br>
To: "CentOS mailing list" <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <000801c8c222$44ae9d70$0101a8c0@signet><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
can we configure offline file shares in samba as we do on a windows pc<br>
<br>
Gopinath<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080530/35b07475/attachment-0001.htm" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080530/35b07475/attachment-0001.htm</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 67<br>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 00:51:30 -0700<br>
From: John R Pierce <<a href="mailto:pierce@hogranch.com">pierce@hogranch.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] offline file shares<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483FB202.4010802@hogranch.com">483FB202.4010802@hogranch.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>
<br>
gopinath wrote:<br>
> can we configure offline file shares in samba as we do on a windows pc<br>
<br>
afaik, a windows client can be told to support an offline share thats on<br>
a samba serrver, as the offline feature involves client side caching of<br>
the files.<br>
<br>
I seriously doubt the samba client for unix would know how to do offline<br>
files, however.<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 68<br>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 15:53:14 +0800<br>
From: Christopher Chan <<a href="mailto:christopher@ias.com.hk">christopher@ias.com.hk</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] offline file shares<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483FB26A.8010805@ias.com.hk">483FB26A.8010805@ias.com.hk</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>
<br>
gopinath wrote:<br>
> can we configure offline file shares in samba as we do on a windows pc<br>
<br>
Whatcha mean? Prevent offline caching?<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 69<br>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 10:27:52 +0200<br>
From: Fabian Arrotin - oxygen <<a href="mailto:fabian.arrotin@arrfab.net">fabian.arrotin@arrfab.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] offline file shares<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:483FBA88.10004@arrfab.net">483FBA88.10004@arrfab.net</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br>
<br>
gopinath wrote:<br>
> can we configure offline file shares in samba as we do on a windows pc<br>
><br>
> Gopinath<br>
Do you mean caching files coming from a Windows/SMB share to your CentOS<br>
box ?<br>
Nothing does that but you can write a rsync script if needed ... but<br>
attention to the way rsync will synchronize .. or use unison ?<br>
<br>
Fabian<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 70<br>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 10:40:27 +0200<br>
From: Tru Huynh <<a href="mailto:tru@centos.org">tru@centos.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centosplus vmware kernels....???<br>
To: CentOS mailing list <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:20080530084027.GA10027@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr">20080530084027.GA10027@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 05:19:44PM -0500, Tom Bishop wrote:<br>
> Thanks Tru and Johnny, one more question. Can I just use the<br>
> centos5-testing repo, ie, yum enablerepoxxx install kernel-vm? I ask<br>
> because I tried and while it worked it loaded an older kernel. Should I<br>
> just go to tru's directory and install the RPM directly? Also, ok more than<br>
> one question, are the open-vm-tools in the same repo or only found in<br>
> Johnny's testing directory. Thanks again...<br>
<br>
Hi Les,<br>
<br>
Everything under <a href="http://people.centos.org/tru/" target="_blank">http://people.centos.org/tru/</a> is signed for testing and<br>
feedback before it can be built by the CentOS build systems and<br>
enter either the regular testing repository or their final destination.<br>
You can look at it as alpha release ;).<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Tru<br>
--<br>
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)<br>
<a href="http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B" target="_blank">http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B</a><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: not available<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 189 bytes<br>
Desc: not available<br>
Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080530/533dacbc/attachment-0001.bin" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080530/533dacbc/attachment-0001.bin</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 71<br>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 14:37:32 +0530<br>
From: "gopinath" <<a href="mailto:gopinath@signal-networks.com">gopinath@signal-networks.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] offline file shares<br>
To: "CentOS mailing list" <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Message-ID: <000b01c8c234$97d8b9b0$0101a8c0@signet><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
to create offline share of windows pc in centos of linux box.<br>
<br>
<br>
----- Original Message -----<br>
From: "Fabian Arrotin - oxygen" <<a href="mailto:fabian.arrotin@arrfab.net">fabian.arrotin@arrfab.net</a>><br>
To: "CentOS mailing list" <<a href="mailto:centos@centos.org">centos@centos.org</a>><br>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 1:57 PM<br>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] offline fi...<br><br>[Message clipped] </blockquote></div><br>