<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Paul wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:1215988642.4849.5.camel@chilly" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 22:23 +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Am 13.07.2008 um 22:14 schrieb Ryan Nichols:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Johnny Hughes wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
If it works ok on the old kernel, it should also work OK on the new
one.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Not if it's a binary-driver...
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
I'm familiar with the card & driver ... it's a binary blob with a bit of
source to glue it to the kernel. The card is also fakeraid rather than
real raid ... more trouble than it's worth.
Paul
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:CentOS@centos.org">CentOS@centos.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
So its junk? What would you recommend we move to then? Wont that be
messy on the card change to another raid5 set?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Ryan Nichols<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>