<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Laurence Alexander Hurst <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:L.A.Hurst@lboro.ac.uk">L.A.Hurst@lboro.ac.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
2 things jump out:<br>
1. As has already been pointed out that is not a Centos Plus kernel. Did you reboot after installing the new kernel? (You have to reboot for a kernel update in order to be running the new kernel).</blockquote><div>
<br>Thanks Akemi & Lawrence for pointing out the obvious that I was blind to! :D<br>I overlooked the exclude line for the Centos Update repo so yum took the wrong kernel update instead. Now downloading 2.6.18-92.1.10.el5.centos.plus and hopes everything will work after this.<br>
<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
2. 1 hour to copy 100GB sounds like a very good speed. Obviously the eSATA interface will be the fastest as it will the the same as having it plugged directly into the SATA controller. For reference I recently copied 73GB from an internal SATA drive to an internal (software) raid0 array (made up of 2 SATA disks), and that took 1.5hours.</blockquote>
<div><br>The first day's transfer just completed and it took about 1hr 10 minutes for 101GB, from du -h, which I think is in terms of 1024. So that's like 24.6MB/s which admittedly appears to be around the maximum real world data transfer rate for USB 2.0. According to some reviews of this WD model, the Firewire was supposedly up to 1/3 faster (they had figures of 35MBps vs 44Mbps).<br>
<br>So I am hoping to see a similar speed from the Firewire here to save some 20 minutes of waiting time, a whole week's backup would be almost 2.5 hours of savings!<br><br>Going to reboot the system now with the new kernel and hopes I don't lose the NIC or something :D<br>
<br><br><br></div></div></div>