<HTML dir=ltr><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=unicode">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16915" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText94505 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>Turned out to be a download problem, not a mirror problem.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>--Joe</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><BR>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> centos-bounces@centos.org on behalf of Greenseid, Joseph M (IS)<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thu 10/29/2009 10:46 AM<BR><B>To:</B> CentOS Mailing List<BR><B>Subject:</B> [CentOS] problem with 5.4 x86_64 DVD iso?<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>Hi all,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I downloaded the 5.4 x86_64 DVD ISO this morning (CentOS-5.4-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso). However, the md5sum and sha1sums both don't match what's in the md5sum.txt or the release notes (<A href="http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.4">http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.4</A>). I downloaded two ISOs from two different mirrors, RIT and ANL, and both ISOs have the same checksums (match each other), which are different from the published md5sums and sha1sums.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Was there a problem with the dissemination of the ISOs to the mirrors? I could understand one mirror having a problem, but two mirrors with the exact same broken image seems like it may be an upstream problem? Anyone have any idea what's up?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>--Joe</FONT></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>