<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
I'm using rsync with a cronjob everynight at 11 pm to do the following:<div><br></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><div><ol><li>sync relevant directories to a running phsycial machine (same specs more or lesS)</li><li>Sync relevant directories to a running Virtual Machine(vmware) </li></ol></div></blockquote>On down time i'll run either one of those machines till problem is fixed. <div><br></div><div>wouldn't that be enough?</div><div><br></div><div><br><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span><br><br>> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 03:01:56 -0800<br>> From: jdmls@yahoo.com<br>> To: centos@centos.org<br>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos installation Vs Disk partitioning<br>> <br>> From: Roland RoLaNd <r_o_l_a_n_d@hotmail.com><br>> > 1. Drive A (320 GB): OS <br>> > 2. Drive B (1 TB): Mysql + /home<br>> > 3. Drive C (1 TB): /development + /opt<br>> <br>> Does that mean no RAID and downtime to recover from backups is acceptable...?<br>> <br>> JD<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> CentOS mailing list<br>> CentOS@centos.org<br>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos<br></div></div> </body>
</html>