<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 02/18/2011 11:03 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:20110218160322.GU2690@frodo.gerdesas.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:50:23AM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
I personally don't see how the RH team could have screwed up and
omitted SRPMs from the manifest, but I certainly believe they did
according to reports.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
At some point do you think perhaps you can learn how to trim
replies to only that which is germane to the reply and not
include all the cascade text and attributions which proceeded it
as a courtesy to others on this list?
It seems that nearly every release there are SRPMs that fail to
make it to Redhat's public ftp server. It happens during
releases and it happens for normal updates and is nothing new.
It's simple human error, not a conspiracy to harm CentOS or any
other rebuilding effort. Can you please keep the conspiracy
nonsense to yourself?
John</pre>
</blockquote>
I thought the big thing made about bottom posting is so you can see the
whole thread. If you cut out<br>
a bunch then you might as well top post.<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
Stephen Clark<br>
<b>NetWolves</b><br>
Sr. Software Engineer III<br>
Phone: 813-579-3200<br>
Fax: 813-882-0209<br>
Email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:steve.clark@netwolves.com">steve.clark@netwolves.com</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.netwolves.com">http://www.netwolves.com</a><br>
</div>
</body>
</html>