<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 04/11/2011 01:08 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:BANLkTi=V9K9Wvr7qM0kD4303Xzou4nY4LQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Steve Clark <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:sclark@netwolves.com"><sclark@netwolves.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes in
0004586 (thanks). I am pleased to report
that they appear to work as advertised. With:
net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding = 2
net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra = 2
Router solicitations were issued and router advertisements were accepted and
I could still forward packets.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I have built the latest version of cplus kernel with the patches
applied. The proposed process for patch addition did work well. It is
available as 'kernel-devel-2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1' from:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://centos.toracat.org/kernel/centos6/centosplus-testing/">http://centos.toracat.org/kernel/centos6/centosplus-testing/</a>
Steve, could you please test this kernel? Looks like this is going to
be the first patch set added to the C6plus kernel.
Sure - I am downloading it now.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Oops - I am using i386 not x86_64 and it appears you only have re-compiled
the x86_64 kernels. At least
that is what I am assuming looking at the dates and the fact the i386 kernel
did not work in regards to the new
behavior with router solicitations and router advertisements.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Thank you for the testing.
Odd. I did build both arches. x86_64 was re-rebuilt after the i386
version, which is why it has a newer date.
I will go back to the drawing board and make sure the patches are in place.
If I may ask one more thing ... I think we should continue the current
effort in the bug tracker rather than here on this list. Would you
mind filing a new request at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://bugs.centos.org">http://bugs.centos.org</a> under the
CentOS-6-Plus category ?
</pre>
</blockquote>
Hmm... without looking at the dates of the files I had downloaded
the <br>
<br>
<pre> <a href="http://centos.toracat.org/kernel/centos6/centosplus-testing/i386/kernel-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.centos.ayplus.i686.rpm">kernel-2.6.32-71.18.2.el6.centos.ayplus.i686.rpm</a> 09-Mar-2011 11:36
files let me try the
<a href="http://centos.toracat.org/kernel/centos6/centosplus-testing/i386/kernel-2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1.i686.rpm">kernel-2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1.i686.rpm</a> 08-Apr-2011 19:06 21M
</pre>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
Stephen Clark<br>
<b>NetWolves</b><br>
Sr. Software Engineer III<br>
Phone: 813-579-3200<br>
Fax: 813-882-0209<br>
Email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:steve.clark@netwolves.com">steve.clark@netwolves.com</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.netwolves.com">http://www.netwolves.com</a><br>
</div>
</body>
</html>