<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>On Apr 15, 2011, at 4:48 AM, Rudi Ahlers <<a href="mailto:Rudi@SoftDux.com">Rudi@SoftDux.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:office@plnet.rs"><a href="mailto:office@plnet.rs">office@plnet.rs</a></a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">John R Pierce wrote:<br>
> On 04/14/11 5:43 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:<br>
>> On Friday, April 15, 2011 02:46 AM, John R Pierce wrote:<br>
>>> On 04/14/11 7:44 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:<br>
>>>> Now, if OpenIndiana resists using illumos...<br>
>>> openindiana is under the Illumos project umbrella. They aren't going to<br>
>>> use anything else.<br>
>> Eh? I was under the impression that they are separate and that Garrett<br>
>> Damore was rather unhappy with the initial direction of OpenIndiana in<br>
>> not preparing for an illumos release. 148 is still not illumos as far as<br>
>> I know.<br>
><br>
> afaik, both are still using pretty much the last opensolaris kernel with<br>
> minor changes<br>
><br>
><br>
> I was going on this, which says OpenIndiana is a member of the Illumos<br>
> Foundation, that Illumos was providing the core/kernel, and OpenIndiana<br>
> is integrating it into a complete system aka distribution<br>
> <a href="http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Frequently+Asked+Questions#FrequentlyAskedQuestions-WhatistherelationshipbetweenOpenIndianaandIllumos%3F" target="_blank"><a href="http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Frequently+Asked+Questions#FrequentlyAskedQuestions-WhatistherelationshipbetweenOpenIndianaandIllumos%3F">http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Frequently+Asked+Questions#FrequentlyAskedQuestions-WhatistherelationshipbetweenOpenIndianaandIllumos%3F</a></a><br>
><br>
> They go onto say they are waiting for Illumos to mature before they<br>
> integrate it.<br>
<br>
</div>Eham..., CentOS mailinglist.... maybe to continue in private?<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Ljubomir<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"></div></div></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Eham....., many people are learning a lot more from this thread than a lot of the other threads in the past few days. let them continue, and don't subscribe to the tread :)</div></div></blockquote><br><div>I agree with both assessments, but since this is a CentOS list and this thread has now twisted into ZFS advocacy I must say as well, continue off list.</div><div><br></div><div>-Ross</div><div><br></div></body></html>