I haven't, no. I'm in Cambridge this week so my free time is a bit limited. Next week you'll have my full attention.
Have you moved to 4.2-rc3 ? If so there would be some minor conflict (apart from 4.2-rc2) which I could help to address.
Just in case - I've prepared patches for 4.2-rc2.
________________________________________
From: arm-dev-bounces@centos.org <arm-dev-bounces@centos.org> on behalf of Jim Perrin <jperrin@centos.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 7:21 PM
To: arm-dev@centos.org
Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy
I ran into a couple applying the patchset, but I think this is mostly
solvable, and due to the fact that we don't have the kernel in git yet
for common patching/updates. I'll play around with it a bit more this
afternoon.
On 07/30/2015 05:03 AM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Were you able to apply patches and test them?
> Are there any issues ? if so please let me know...
>
> WBR,
> Vadim
>
> ________________________________________
> From: arm-dev-bounces@centos.org <arm-dev-bounces@centos.org> on behalf of Jim Perrin <jperrin@centos.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 3:58 PM
> To: arm-dev@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy
>
> Overall, it will be easier when we have this alternate kernel plumbed
> into git and patches/pull requests can be done directly against the
> repo. I'll pull your patches a bit later today and try them out.
>
>
>
> On 07/27/2015 06:09 AM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote:
>> Yes, but not sure if did this in right way.
>> I've updated config-arm64 with new options and was able to build rpms.
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: arm-dev-bounces@centos.org <arm-dev-bounces@centos.org> on behalf of Jim Perrin <jperrin@centos.org>
>> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 10:03 PM
>> To: arm-dev@centos.org
>> Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy
>>
>> Sorry, I've been out at OSCON this week with somewhat limited
>> connectivity. Were you able to get this sorted?
>>
>> On 07/22/2015 11:23 AM, Lomovtsev, Vadim wrote:
>>> I'm trying to rebuild kernel rpm but it fails due to new options in .config has been added, any help with that would be much appreciated?
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: arm-dev-bounces@centos.org <arm-dev-bounces@centos.org> on behalf of Jim Perrin <jperrin@centos.org>
>>> Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 5:03 PM
>>> To: arm-dev@centos.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] CentOS kernel submission policy
>>>
>>> I've currently working on a kernel build that's based off the fedora
>>> tree. The commit hash I'm building from there is
>>>
>>> 228ccc4defbda4317b06d561e5fb532c774fe2e2
>>>
>>> My changes are mostly to the spec file, and the removal of the kdbus
>>> patches. You can find the src.rpm for my kernel at ->
>>> http://people.centos.org/jperrin/kernels/kernel-4.2.0-0.rc2.git0.1.centos.el7.src.rpm
>>>
>>> I have a bit more specfile cleanup to do here, but it will work to patch
>>> against.
>>>
>>> On 07/17/2015 08:53 AM, Vadim.Lomovtsev@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> We have some set of patches for our processor (Cavium Thunderx) and would like
>>>> to add them to CentOS kernel for the time while they are being submitted into
>>>> mainline.
>>>>
>>>> Is there any set policy for submitting patches to be included into CentOS
>>>> kernel? And which kernel version/commit I should base my changes on?
>>>>
>>>> Vadim
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Arm-dev mailing list
>>>> Arm-dev@centos.org
>>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jim Perrin
>>> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
>>> twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Arm-dev mailing list
>>> Arm-dev@centos.org
>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Arm-dev mailing list
>>> Arm-dev@centos.org
>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jim Perrin
>> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
>> twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
>> _______________________________________________
>> Arm-dev mailing list
>> Arm-dev@centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Arm-dev mailing list
>> Arm-dev@centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
>>
>
> --
> Jim Perrin
> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
> twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
> _______________________________________________
> Arm-dev mailing list
> Arm-dev@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Arm-dev mailing list
> Arm-dev@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
>
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
_______________________________________________
Arm-dev mailing list
Arm-dev@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
_______________________________________________
Arm-dev mailing list
Arm-dev@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev