CI-users

ci-users@lists.centos.org

1 participants
418 discussions

Issues with scl
by Katerina Foniok 15 Apr '20

15 Apr '20

Hello guys, we are often having problems with Jenkins job [1] where sometimes we are not able to use scl command. It just says `scl: command not found`. We are not sure how we could solve this problem or if it is some problem with nodes and you could help us with that? The job is running on devtools-ci-slave04. Thank you for your time. Have a nice day, Katka [1] https://ci.centos.org/job/devtools-rh-che-periodic-prod-1a/2340/console

3 4

Availability of ppc64le and aarch64 nodes in cico
by Vipul Siddharth 24 Mar '20

24 Mar '20

Hi folks, We have added ppc64le and aarch64 nodes for both 8 and 8-stream in the cico-pool that you can checkout through python-cicoclient Example: `cico node get --arch ppc64le --release 8 --flavor medium` The pool count[0] has been updated accordingly. The number is very limited as of now due to infrastructure limitations but we will monitor the usage of the nodes and will adjust the pool count that suits the best. If you notice any problem, do let me know here or on #centos-ci@Freenode Thank you, stay safe and wash hands :) [0] https://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/CI/Duffy -- Vipul Siddharth He/His/Him Fedora | CentOS CI Infrastructure Team Red Hat w: vipul.dev

1 0

No space left on device
by Katerina Foniok 04 Mar '20

04 Mar '20

Hello guys, our tests failed on `No space left on device` [1]. Could you please take a look at that? Thank you for your effort. Have a nice day, Katka [1] https://ci.centos.org/view/Devtools/job/devtools-rh-che-rh-che-prcheck-dev.…

5 6

Missing recent builds
by František Šumšal 07 Feb '20

07 Feb '20

Hello, I just noticed that many of the recent builds from our Jenkins slave[0] were unexpectedly removed, even though they shouldn't be, according to the retention policy (which is set to keep builds for 90 days in all affected jobs). As it's not the first time this happened I'm curious if there's some other retention policy we should be aware of, as this is kind of annoying - the missing jobs are a few days old, some of them failed, but apart from not being able to check the logs, we can't even reschedule them, because they don't exist anymore. Note: the retention policy is currently set unnecessarily high - that's a remnant from the last time this issue occurred, as I thought Jenkins is simply miscalculating the retention policy configuration. Cutting it to 45 or even 30 days should be an issue to conserve space on the master. PS: sorry for the double post, Vipul, I accidentally dropped the ML from To: Thank you, Frantisek [0] systemd-ci-slave01 -- PGP Key ID: 0xFB738CE27B634E4B

2 3

URGENT - https://ci.centos.org/ is down
by Maor Friedman 26 Jan '20

26 Jan '20

Hello, https://ci.centos.org/ is returning a 502 Bad Gateway. Is there anyone that can look into this? Thanks, -- Maor Friedman Senior Software Engineer, Application SRE team, Service Delivery Red Hat maor(a)redhat.com

2 4

Dirty nodes
by Katerina Foniok 24 Jan '20

24 Jan '20

Hello guys, it seems that data are not cleaned correctly from the nodes. Some of our tests are failing on that. E.g. https://ci.centos.org/view/Devtools/job/devtools-rh-che-periodic-prod-2aPro… where the folder with the logs already exists. This job was run on devtools-ci-slave04. Thank you for your time. Have a nice day! Katka Foniok

4 9

CentOS 7/8 OpenSSL / FIPS 140-2 / FedRAMP
by Salman Baset 19 Jan '20

19 Jan '20

Hello, I was wondering if the source code for OpenSSL (1.1.*) in CentOS 7 and 8 is exactly the same as Red Hat and thus would be considered equivalent from a FIPS 140-2 cert standpoint. See the RHEL 7.0 OpenSSL FIPS certificate below. https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/cryptographic-module-validation-program/Cert… Also, has anyone recently used Cent OS 7 with OpenSSL EL rpm (1.1.*) to successfully obtain FedRAMP Moderate authorization or was it necessary to switch to Red Hat? Thanks Salman

1 0

using ci.centos.org for quarkus opensource project builds ?
by Max Andersen 13 Jan '20

13 Jan '20

Hi, I was chatting with Paul Bergene if it was possible to use ci.centos.org for off-loading some of Quarkus opensource project builds. We got two kind of builds we would be interested in "offloading". First are regular jobs which would be easy to setup via jenkins. Question here is if docker builds and runs are allowed in the nodes ? I remember there being some limitations earlier on this ? The other is if it is in any way possible to use ci.centos.org as target for github actions ? Is that something that have been considered enabling? Thanks, -- /max https://about.me/maxandersen

3 2

Install & enable NTP on Duffy nodes
by František Šumšal 13 Jan '20

13 Jan '20

Hello! After recent struggles with compilation under Vagrant over NFS, I'd like to ask if it would be possible to automatically sync all machines provided by Duffy using NTP. We encountered several nasty race conditions caused by system time discrepancies between a Duffy host and a VM, which I managed to mitigate by installing & enabling chrony. Unfortunately, it's not perfect, as the time synchronization apparently takes some time, so the race condition is present, but it's much less probable. Going through Jenkins logs it looks that all machines have their time significantly off: ● chronyd.service - NTP client/server Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/chronyd.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (running) since Sun 2020-01-12 16:06:53 GMT; 5h 51min left Docs: man:chronyd(8) man:chrony.conf(5) Main PID: 1992 (chronyd) CGroup: /system.slice/chronyd.service └─1992 /usr/sbin/chronyd Jan 12 16:06:53 n15.pufty systemd[1]: Starting NTP client/server... Jan 12 16:06:53 n15.pufty chronyd[1992]: chronyd version 3.4 starting (+CMDMON +NTP +REFCLOCK +RTC +PRIVDROP +SCFILTER +SIGND +ASYNCDNS +SECHASH +IPV6 +DEBUG) Jan 12 16:06:53 n15.pufty systemd[1]: Started NTP client/server. Jan 12 16:07:01 n15.pufty chronyd[1992]: Selected source xx.xx.xx.xx Jan 12 16:07:01 n15.pufty chronyd[1992]: System clock wrong by -21251.336765 seconds, adjustment started Jan 12 10:12:50 n15.pufty chronyd[1992]: System clock was stepped by -21251.336765 seconds I suspect waiting for the synchronization to fully complete using chrony's CLI utilities would help, but having this to be handled automatically by each machine would be much better. Thanks! Frantisek -- PGP Key ID: 0xFB738CE27B634E4B

2 1

Duffy seems to be out of CentOS 7 nodes
by František Šumšal 03 Jan '20

03 Jan '20

Hello! Sorry to bother you during holidays, but is looks like Duffy has a trouble provisioning CentOS 7 nodes: ``` 2019-12-26 07:36:18,171 [agent-control/allocate_node] INFO: Attempting to allocate a node (7 x86_64) ... 2019-12-26 07:52:19,680 [agent-control/allocate_node] INFO: Waiting 1800 seconds before another retry 2019-12-26 08:22:19,757 [agent-control/_execute_api_command] INFO: Duffy request URL: xxx 2019-12-26 08:22:19,759 [connectionpool/_new_conn] INFO: Starting new HTTP connection (1): xxx 2019-12-26 08:22:20,029 [agent-control/allocate_node] ERROR: Received unexpected response from the server: Insufficient Nodes in READY State 2019-12-26 08:22:20,029 [agent-control/allocate_node] INFO: Waiting 3600 seconds before another retry 2019-12-26 09:22:20,126 [agent-control/allocate_node] ERROR: Failed to allocated a node 2019-12-26 09:22:20,126 [agent-control/<module>] CRITICAL: Can't continue without a valid node ``` -- Frantisek Sumsal GPG key ID: 0xFB738CE27B634E4B

2 7

← Newer
1
...
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
...
42
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

CI-users