CI-users

ci-users@lists.centos.org

2 participants
420 discussions

Setting Github Access token not resolving Github API rate limit error
by Budh Gurung 03 Feb '17

03 Feb '17

Hi, A week ago, CI-admin had added our requested github token for 'minishift' [1] to the credential store [2]. However, assuming things will go as expected, we are still facing "Github API rate limit" error in our builds [3]. We tried to debug with adding stdout logs (see below at time in build console log [4]) in our code and found token empty. - *00:00:53.627* * - **00:07:04.759* Also, suggests us the proper way to debug in this type of scenarios with no UI access as we are new to JJB approach. [1] https://github.com/minishift/minishift [2] https://github.com/minishift/minishift-ci-jobs/pull/11 [3] https://ci.centos.org/job/minishift/88/console (same with #86, #87) [4] https://ci.centos.org/job/minishift/83/console (same with #81) Regards, Budh Ram Gurung Software Engineer - Devtools

2 1

CI Maintenance Window 01-Feb-2017 20:00 US-Eastern (02-Feb-2017 01:00 UTC)
by Brian Stinson 02 Feb '17

02 Feb '17

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Folks, We will be issuing a 1hr maintenance window at 20:00 Eastern Time on 01-Feb-2017 for package/kernel upgrades on the Jenkins Slaves, and to update to the latest Jenkins LTS. If you have not commented on the Ansible thread yet, this is the last chance to ACK/NAK an upgrade to Ansible 2.2 on the slaves: https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/ci-users/2017-January/000479.html As usual we will start the quiet period 1 hour before the window begins in order to allow for jobs to finish. Cheers! - -- Brian Stinson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJYjE8wAAoJEIMGvNKzCweMe+oQAIpDFYR1LaQAitrxmvzBH+Ew D/eiOHJz/9Ver3Bh5HXU9FGNa3qR/r7IkOVpFjneYFXp14WPe8vbcZqORGDT3HO7 2ULjeHIOUZUoINrds48kyF0VjVvtg/Ix2BIn66iCey9I5ndP3Ycs9sdxhtF5Zv97 Geq8UJPjJO8WDYq3vyAFWuA9JT8F+v9f6XZ+0+6joD/lJMAliWLiWDUvZCTkjL7q YUVB+8BSp/92xhnLSXpTkt/5T66tKbUxLBln2o/2GPcmrv7YqUe6hF65vTo4F1u4 g/j+Egq1UFQnFpFq2H7tZ8oSzBc9vUeZ8xwI5W8qUAGXOIVZGUb2sx3LPAhbgTEB xqsqdSRA+YId/ZWkaSnSauEpevUQsLoTSLClegbf7t3xLTV30O+xa68lSkhCzID7 sZAYErvxMIjYMIIJUWcuyfOJmTGfc0xzLycetK4lzdYerX1tBMZZmzPCoxWatYYt RomPqct6oYWh3sCWylwqOws3rwzZpoWknTheHOUwANvtjUmT9HCXc/4bYJqXyyG9 RUcR1ym3XiWey3DS7k3zNQ4EGyU+FfuRo0gSGayec5ccr67NokBTSs9k+wWH7tCq US3s4CdnteCqwjoXruLox0F0p9gsBrGirmeQ0qM5y/M0Jo8bHNIASF2ta58TRlux 25torhV1nnNUHnHLXW6i =nDfw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 2

Re: [Ci-users] Ansible Update from 1.9.6 -> 2.X
by Laurentiu Pancescu 01 Feb '17

01 Feb '17

On 01/02/17 17:03, Brian Stinson wrote: > On Feb 01 15:22, Laurentiu Pancescu wrote: >> Since Fedora already makes the effort to provide the current Ansible >> releases in EPEL, it would be a pity not to take advantage of that. > > We're planning to track what's going through CBS, which isn't > necessarily the same lifecycle as EPEL > > The PaaS SIG is releasing: > http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=14071 From a quick look at the changelog, that particular CBS build is missing the security fixes from 2.2.1.0 (CVE-2016-9587, CVE-2016-8647, CVE-2016-9587 and CVE-2016-8647). I understand that we'd probably like to have full control over when a version upgrade takes place (not to break things), but we'd need to backport the security fixes. Or isn't security an issue since cico is an isolated environment? The main reason behind my proposal to adopt whatever Fedora packages was to get security fixes from the security team that handles EPEL and Fedora. For me, it's still unclear how fast are security fixes landing in SIG-provided packages. But that's certainly your decision to make, I'm fine with it either way. :)

2 2

Ansible Update from 1.9.6 -> 2.X
by Brian Stinson 01 Feb '17

01 Feb '17

Hi Folks, We've been shipping Ansible 1.9.x on the slaves for a while now. Do any of you have use-cases to stay pinned to such an old version? We'd like to update at least to the 2.1 branch (2.2 has some templating/variable-quoting gotchas) in the near future. Questions, comments? --Brian

5 7

Fix for the Jenkins browser memory leak on cico?
by Laurentiu Pancescu 23 Jan '17

23 Jan '17

Hi there, My proposed fix for Jenkins causing memory leaks in all major browsers has now been accepted upstream. [1] Is there any chance of patching ci.centos.org to include it? Regards, Laurențiu [1] https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/2539

4 5

jjb timeouts talking to Jenkins master
by Colin Walters 19 Jan '17

19 Jan '17

I'm seeing timeouts trying to run JJB: ``` INFO:jenkins_jobs.builder:Number of jobs generated: 21 INFO:jenkins_jobs.builder:Reconfiguring jenkins job atomic-duffy-allocate Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/jenkins_jobs/parallel.py", line 62, in run **task['kwargs']) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/jenkins_jobs/builder.py", line 435, in parallel_update_job self.jenkins.update_job(job.name, job.output().decode('utf-8')) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/jenkins_jobs/parallel.py", line 112, in parallelized return func(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/jenkins_jobs/builder.py", line 161, in update_job self.jenkins.reconfig_job(job_name, xml) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/jenkins/__init__.py", line 1019, in reconfig_job DEFAULT_HEADERS)) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/jenkins/__init__.py", line 431, in jenkins_open response = urlopen(req, timeout=self.timeout).read() File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 154, in urlopen return opener.open(url, data, timeout) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 437, in open response = meth(req, response) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 550, in http_response 'http', request, response, code, msg, hdrs) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 475, in error return self._call_chain(*args) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 409, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 558, in http_error_default raise HTTPError(req.get_full_url(), code, msg, hdrs, fp) HTTPError: HTTP Error 504: Gateway Time-out ``` Is anyone else experiencing this? Any useful log messages on the Jenkins server side?

3 2

local caching for docker images
by Karanbir Singh 18 Jan '17

18 Jan '17

hi, the docker-distribution package can act as a smart proxy for docker registries; and having a local cache inside the ci infra would help speed up a lot of the jobs I am working with at the moment there. Do we have the space to host a cache of this nature ? I'd think a 15 to 20 GB of space is all we need. Could we then have dns inside the ci infra use this cache for the dockerhub urls ? Any objections to getting this in ? regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

3 5

New f25 and opensuse-42.1 slaves for libguestfs
by Pino Toscano 06 Jan '17

06 Jan '17

Hi, I'd like to register new vm's/slaves for the libguestfs hypervisor: - fedora-25 (libguestfs-ci-f25slave) - opensuse-42.1 (libguestfs-ci-opensuse-42.1-slave01) could you please provide credentials for them? Thanks, -- Pino Toscano

2 1

ci.centos.org is loading quite slow
by Budh Gurung 22 Dec '16

22 Dec '16

Hi, I am experiencing quite slow loading of ci.centos.org dashboard. Anyone experiencing the same? Regards, Budh Ram Gurung Software Engineer - Devtools

2 1

Short Jenkins saferestart Friday 16-Dec-2016 20:00 Eastern (17-Dec, 01:00 UTC)
by Brian Stinson 15 Dec '16

15 Dec '16

Hi Folks, We'll do a short restart of the ci.centos.org Jenkins frontend on Friday 16-Dec-2016 at 8PM UTC to install some plugins. This should be a short downtime and other services (duffy, agent processes, etc) will not be affected. If there are any questions please contact us in #centos-devel on freenode. Cheers! -- Brian Stinson CentOS CI Infrastructure Team

1 0

← Newer
1
...
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
...
42
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

CI-users