CI-users

ci-users@lists.centos.org

2 participants
420 discussions

Moving forward with the upgrade to Jenkins 2.x LTS - Action Needed for JJB Users!
by Brian Stinson 16 Aug '16

16 Aug '16

Hi Folks, We're looking into upgrading ci.centos.org to the latest LTS release (In the 2.x series). So far this appears to be completely backwards-compatible with the set of plugins we have enabled, though we will continue testing over the next few days. *JJB USERS READ HERE* If you use Jenkins Job Builder in your projects, can you please test setting 'query_plugins_info=False' in your jjb.ini file and check for adverse effects? We are still waiting on a fix in Jenkins to allow regular users to access the plugin list, but in the meantime it appears that there are only a few circumstances where this makes a difference. If all goes well, we will schedule a time and inform the list on our plans for the upgrade itself. As always if you have any questions, please let us know here. Cheers! -- Brian Stinson CentOS CI Infrastructure Team

3 3

RDO jobs in cico
by Karanbir Singh 15 Aug '16

15 Aug '16

hi guys, with an increase in the number of slaves, we've noticed that the rdo jobs are deploying machines at a much higher velocity than before - as a result the ready pool is consistently hitting the low water mark. Rather than do an overall quota limit, I'm looking at limiting the number of duffy deploy's per 10 min cycle, but rather than propose something I'd like to see what folks think is a reasonable number to start from ? regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

6 15

Centos-ci github user invitation
by Marek Skalický 12 Aug '16

12 Aug '16

Hello, I am running tests in ci.centos.org for centos docker images and I would like to be able to use option "List of organizations. Their members will be whitelisted." in Jenkins GitHub pull request builder plugin. However for this it is necessary to have centos-ci github user in sclorg github organization (https://github.com/sclorg) Invitation should be already pending for this user, so if there is no problem, someone please accept it. Thanks very much, Marek

2 1

gluster_glusterd2 builds failing by failing to set github status
by Kaushal M 11 Aug '16

11 Aug '16

Hi all, So I've got centos-ci reporting status back to github for the gluster_glusterd2 job. But the builds still get marked as failures because Jenkins still apparantly fails to report back to Github. For eg., [1] is a build started for [2], which has been marked as a failure because reporting failed. But this failure was still reported back. In the console output, the actual build finishes at the end of `make test`. Which is a success. But I see two other 'Setting commit status' messages of which one failed, and caused the build to be marked as a failure. Has anyone seen this before, and know why it happens? And how can this be fixed? ~kaushal [1]: https://ci.centos.org/job/gluster_glusterd2/7/console [2]: https://github.com/gluster/glusterd2/pull/117

3 4

Re: [Ci-users] Access to Openstack Infrastructure within ci.centos.org
by Clint Savage 03 Aug '16

03 Aug '16

Can we have access to the new openstack infrastructure? Access should probably be for Ari, SK, myself, and Bill Peck. Let me know what info you need and I'll provide it. I originally just mailed this to KB, but since the access is broader, it's probably best to do this in the open. Thanks! herlo

4 8

Github Collaborator invite - gluster/glusterd2
by Kaushal M 03 Aug '16

03 Aug '16

Hi, Could one of the admins accept the collaborator invite for centos-ci to gluster/glusterd2? I'd like to get reports back from ci.centos.org back to github for this project. Thanks. Kaushal

2 2

Access to ci.centos.org/artifacts from the new OpenStack subnet
by David Moreau Simard 03 Aug '16

03 Aug '16

Hi, Right now it is my understanding that access to the artifacts rsync server is restricted to the subnet 172.19.0.0/22. The virtual machines in the new OpenStack cloud are located in 172.19.4.0/22 and are therefore getting permission denied errors. This is a problem if we want to be uploading artifacts from a virtual machine. The vast majority of our artifacts are uploaded from the Duffy bare metal node (logs and so on) and it was our expectation that we could continue with this workflow with the OpenStack cloud. It sounds rather inefficient (but doable nonetheless) to first pull the logs from the node (baremetal or VM) to the slave and then re-upload it to the artifacts server but we'd rather avoid that. Is there anything we can do ? Thanks, David Moreau Simard Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]

3 2

duffy/networking hangups
by Colin Walters 28 Jul '16

28 Jul '16

I'm seeing rather frequent issues where jobs that allocate a Duffy machine and ssh in end up losing network between my slave and the duffy machine - I can't ping even. https://ci.centos.org/job/atomic-fedora-ws-treecompose/49/console is an example run, but there are a number of others. Are there any available server side logs that might help debug this?

4 5

adding content to the output of duffy
by Karanbir Singh 28 Jul '16

28 Jul '16

hi guys, In the coming days, I am going to try and add some more content to the json returned on calls made into duffy. My take on this is : if everyone is parsing json cleanly, this should not break any existing tooling. Is that an accurate assumption ? regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

2 3

Reaping on schedule
by Karanbir Singh 27 Jul '16

27 Jul '16

hi folks, >From this weekend on we are going to start reaping everyone's machines. There are a few people with machines allocated that are not in reserved state, that will get powered down on Monday, so if there is anything you need from those nodes, please ensure that you back it up before the weekend. There are a few options : 1) stage your data on the artifacts machine if you need content to persist 2) in exception cases ( like libvirt and libguestfs ) we can reserve a node that you can self manage, that way it wont get reaped. But you need a good reason why we need to block a physical machine. If your project is already in the reclaim pool, this wont impact you. Regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

1 0

← Newer
1
...
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
...
42
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

CI-users